An In-Depth Look at Dispositional Reasoning and Interviewer Accuracy

@article{deKock2015AnIL,
  title={An In-Depth Look at Dispositional Reasoning and Interviewer Accuracy},
  author={François S. de Kock and Filip Lievens and Marise Ph. Born},
  journal={Human Performance},
  year={2015},
  volume={28},
  pages={199 - 221}
}
Dispositional reasoning is defined as general reasoning about traits, behaviors, and situations. Although earlier accuracy studies found that it predicted interview judgment accuracy, they did not distinguish between its underlying components (i.e., trait induction, trait extrapolation, and trait contextualization). This drawback has hampered insight into the nature of the dispositional reasoning construct. Therefore, we use a componential approach to test if dispositional reasoning adheres to… 
A Closer Look at the Measurement of Dispositional Reasoning: Dimensionality and Invariance Across Assessor Groups
markdownabstractDespite the growing interest in dispositional reasoning as a construct and determinant of good raters ("good judges"), its measurement still requires attention. We address two
Social Intelligence and Interview Accuracy: Individual Differences in the Ability to Construct Interviews and Rate Accurately
This research examined differences in interviewers’ ability to identify effective interview questions and to accurately rate interviewees’ responses. Given the theoretical association
Individual Differences in Effective Interview Design: Factors Affecting Question Choice
Despite the evidence that structured interviews are superior to unstructured interviews, interviewers remain reluctant to use them for personnel selection. The current research replicated and
Individual Differences in Judgment Accuracy in Personnel Selection
The judgment accuracy of assessors has been an enduring research topic in personnel selection studies. Assessors produce ratings that affect the quality of personnel selection decisions. Although it
Characteristics of the Judge That Are Related to Accuracy
There exists a substantial body of work, dating back nearly a century, exploring individual differences in the ability to accurately judge the personality traits and characteristics of other people.
Integrating situational judgment tests and assessment centre exercises into personality research : challenges and further opportunities
In this rejoinder, I discuss several broad themes that emerged from the 32 commentaries in response to my target article about the value of integrating Situational Judgment Tests and Assessment
Assessing Personality–Situation Interplay in Personnel Selection: Toward More Integration into Personality Research
Over the years, the personnel selection field has developed methods to assess trait expression in particular situations, but these approaches have evolved mostly outside the field of personality
Assessing the candidate in the selection interview: The role of interviewer’s personality
The study explores the relative contribution of interviewers' personality and interviewers' ratings of candidate's personality in predicting interviewers' ratings of candidate's job suitability and
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 95 REFERENCES
The Good Judge Revisited: Individual Differences in the Accuracy of Personality Judgments
This study examined individual differences in the accuracy of personality judgments. Participants (N = 122) reviewed videotaped segments of 3 individuals responding to employment interview questions,
Assessing Personality in the Employment Interview: The Impact of Training on Rater Accuracy
We developed a training protocol to enhance interviewers' knowledge of personality-related cues and, in so doing, improve the accuracy of their personality judgments. Participants (N = 164) watched 3
Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews.
TLDR
A comprehensive taxonomy of 7 types of constructs that the interview could assess was developed, suggesting that at least part of the reason why structured interviews tend to have higher validity is because they focus more on constructs that have a stronger relationship with job performance.
The Good Judge of Personality: Characteristics, Behaviors, and Observer Accuracy.
Accurate Personality Judgment
Personality traits are patterns of thought, emotion, and behavior that are relatively consistent over time and across situations. Judging the traits of others and of oneself is a ubiquitous and
Intuitive interactionism in person perception: effects of situation--behavior relations on dispositional judgments.
TLDR
Both personality impressions and predictive accuracy were influenced by the relations between the target's behaviors and their situational contexts.
The effect of implicit theories on raters' inference in performance judgment: Consequences for the validity of student ratings of instruction
Performance judgment is a situation of incomplete information where raters' inference would play an important role. Consequently, the schematic nature of human cognition may introduce implicit
A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure.
TLDR
A theory was proposed to reconcile paradoxical findings on the invariance of personality and the variability of behavior across situations to account for individual differences in predictable patterns of variability across situations.
Implicit personality theory: Is it illusory?1
Several studies have found a substantial association between subjects' judgments about the co-occurrence of personality items and the items' actual co-occurrence, lending support to the validity of
...
1
2
3
4
5
...