An Experimental Investigation of News Source and the Hostile Media Effect

@article{Arpan2003AnEI,
  title={An Experimental Investigation of News Source and the Hostile Media Effect},
  author={Laura M. Arpan and Arthur A. Raney},
  journal={Journalism \& Mass Communication Quarterly},
  year={2003},
  volume={80},
  pages={265 - 281}
}
This study examined the interaction among different news sources, individual levels of partisanship, and the hostile media effect in sports news. Two hundred and three participants read a balanced story about their home-town college football team in one of three newspapers: the home-town, the cross-state rival university's town, or a neutral-town paper. The study found differences in the hostile media effect across conditions, suggesting the importance of news source in the phenomenon. Further… 

Tables from this paper

Personal Bias or Government Bias? Testing the Hostile Media Effect in a Regulated Press System

This study examines the hostile media effect in relation to partisans’ perception of the slant of news coverage in a highly regulated press environment—Singapore. We found that partisans in Singapore

A Hostile Sports Media?

This study examines how perceptions of a story can be altered simply by manipulating the reported winner or loser of a sports contest as well as how individual perceptions of a sports story change

When Social Media Become Hostile Media: An Experimental Examination of News Sharing, Partisanship, and Follower Count

This study examines whether the characteristics of those who share news articles on social media influence the hostile media effect. In an experiment, participants read a news article shared by 1 of

Broad Reach or Biased Source? Decomposing the Hostile Media Effect

This experiment examined theoretical questions surrounding the hostile media effect-the tendency of partisans on a controversial issue to see news coverage of that issue as biased in favor of the

Polarized Political Communication, Oppositional Media Hostility, and Selective Exposure

Previous research has consistently documented a hostile media effect in which people see bias in balanced reporting on political controversies. In the contemporary fragmented media environment,

BIASED NEWS OR BIASED PUBLIC?

This study investigated the causes of individuals’ perceived news bias in an authoritarian press system—Singapore. We proposed two explanations for individuals’ perception of news article slant: the

When CNN Praises Trump: Effects of Content and Source on Hostile Media Perception

Research on hostile media perception (HMP) has suggested that both news slants and partisan source cues influence individuals’ perception of news bias. Yet, relatively little attention has been paid

Hostile Media or Hostile Source? Bias Perception of Shared News

An experiment was conducted with college students to examine the effects of source and user comments on the perceptions of a shared news story embedded in a blog post. When the shared news was

Is the Media Biased Against Me? A Meta-Analysis of the Hostile Media Effect Research

A considerable number of studies have provided empirical evidence of people's perception of media bias—the hostile media effect (HME). This study conducts a meta-analysis of 34 HME studies. HME, in

Motivated Fake News Perception: The Impact of News Sources and Policy Support on Audiences’ Assessment of News Fakeness

  • S. Tsang
  • Psychology
    Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
  • 2020
An online experiment (N = 280) exposed participants in Hong Kong to an anti-police WhatsApp news message during the extradition bill controversy. Although source verification is commonly recommended
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 38 REFERENCES

The Causes of Hostile Media Judgments

This research investigated the mechanisms involved in the hostile media effect, in which partisans tend to judge news coverage as biased against their own side. Subjects on both sides of the

Congenial public, contrary press, and biased estimates of the climate of opinion.

TLDR
Results supported the hypothesis that people make inferences about the climate of opinion based on their reading of the news, especially the perceived slant of that news, and confirmed that partisans on each side of the issue judged news articles to be biased in a disagreeable direction relative to judgments of those on the other side.

Projection or Persuasive Press? Contrary Effects of Personal Opinion and Perceived News Coverage on Estimates of Public Opinion

This study explores the effects of personal opinion and perceived media content on individuals' assessments of public opinion, as well as the curious phenomenon that, although people perceive public

Ego-Involvement and the Third Person Effect of Televised News Coverage

Two experiments explored the interface between ego-involvement and the third person effect. In Experiment 1, 34 pro-Israeli, 34 pro-Palestinian, and 34 nonpartisan control-group subjects viewed

The Effects of Credibility, Reliance, and Exposure on Media Agenda-Setting: A Path Analysis Model

This study examined three audience attributes in the agenda-setting process: individuals' perceived credibility of the news media, their reliance on the news media for information, and their exposure

BIASED PRESS OR BIASED PUBLIC? ATTITUDES TOWARD MEDIA COVERAGE OF SOCIAL GROUPS

Mass media credibility has been defined and studied largely as an attribute of message sources. This article argues that trust in media can be better understood as a relational variable-an audience

How Credible is the Credibility Crisis?

b Widspread concern about media credibility, fueled by a growing body of rescarch showing public reservations about the media, led to four major surveys of the public's attitudes in 1985. The

DIMENSIONS FOR EVALUATING THE ACCEPTABILITY OF MESSAGE SOURCES

The research reported here extends the work of Hovland and his colleagues on source credibility by investigating the criteria actually used by receivers in evaluating message sources. Three

Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence

People who hold strong opinions on complex social issues are likely to examine relevant empirical evidence in a biased manner. They are apt to accept "confirming" evidence at face value while

Costs and benefits of allegiance : changes in fans' self-ascribed competencies after team victory versus defeat

Two studies examined the effect of game outcome on sports fans' estimates of the team's as well as their own future performance. Consistent with social identity theory, it was expected that Ss for