An Empirical Evaluation of the Connecticut Death Penalty System Since 1973: Are There Unlawful Racial, Gender, and Geographic Disparities?

@article{Donohue2014AnEE,
  title={An Empirical Evaluation of the Connecticut Death Penalty System Since 1973: Are There Unlawful Racial, Gender, and Geographic Disparities?},
  author={John J. Donohue},
  journal={Stanford Law School},
  year={2014}
}
  • John J. Donohue
  • Published 2014
  • Economics
  • Stanford Law School
  • This article analyzes the 205 death-eligible murders leading to homicide convictions in Connecticut from 1973-2007 to determine if discriminatory and arbitrary factors influenced capital outcomes. A regression analysis controlling for an array of legitimate factors relevant to the crime, defendant, and victim provides overwhelming evidence that minority defendants who kill white victims are capitally charged at substantially higher rates than minority defendants who kill minorities, that… CONTINUE READING

    Paper Mentions

    Citations

    Publications citing this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 14 CITATIONS

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.

    What's the Matter with Waterbury? Geographic Bias and the Death Penalty

    • Cameron Ormsby