An Australian Perspective on Research and Development Required for the Construction of Applied Legal Decision Support Systems

@article{Zeleznikow2004AnAP,
  title={An Australian Perspective on Research and Development Required for the Construction of Applied Legal Decision Support Systems},
  author={John Zeleznikow},
  journal={Artificial Intelligence and Law},
  year={2004},
  volume={10},
  pages={237-260}
}
  • John Zeleznikow
  • Published 1 December 2002
  • Computer Science
  • Artificial Intelligence and Law
At the Donald Berman Laboratory for Information Technology and Law, La TrobeUniversity Australia, we have been building legal decision support systems for a dozenyears. Whilst most of our energy has been devoted to conducting research in ArtificialIntelligence and Law, over the past few years we have increasingly focused uponbuilding legal decision support systems that have a commercial focus.In this paper we discuss the evolution of our systems. We begin with a discussion ofrule-based systems… Expand
Reflections on my journey in using Information Technology to support Legal Decision Making—from Legal Positivism to Legal Realism
In this paper I discuss my transition from legal positivism to legal realism and how this has impacted upon my construction of legal decision support systems. As a child living with parents who wereExpand
Building Intelligent Legal Decision Support Systems : Past Practice and Future Challenges
In [91] Susskind outlines the past use of Information Technology (IT), and indicates probable future uses of IT by the legal profession. He indicates that until recently, there was only limited useExpand
Using Artificial Intelligence to provide Intelligent Dispute Resolution Support
TLDR
An initial model for constructing user centric intelligent Online Dispute Resolution systems is developed that integrates Case management, Triaging, Advisory tools, Communication tools, Decision Support Tools and Drafting software. Expand
Using Toulmin Argumentation to develop an Online Dispute Resolution Environment
Our goal is to model reasoning in discretionary legal domains. To do so, we use Knowledge Discovery from Database Techniques. However there are obstacles to this approach, including difficulties inExpand
Can Artificial Intelligence and Online Dispute Resolution Enhance Efficiency and Effectiveness in Courts
TLDR
It is discussed how a hybrid system that incorporates advice about BATNAs and potential trade-offs as well as allowing online communication can enhance access to justice. Expand
Online Dispute Resolution: The Benefits Of Enhancing Alternative Dispute Resolution Through The Use Of Internet Technology
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) has become an established alternative method to litigation in solving disputes in many western jurisdictions. Online dispute resolution (ODR), the application ofExpand
THE COLLABORATIVE MODEL TO SUPPORT DISCRETIONARY DECISION-MAKING IN E-GOVERNMENT
Good governance is the ultimate goal of e-government in an information society. Discretionary powers of administrative officials are often viewed as a major obstacle to good governance in whichExpand
Fundamentals of Providing Negotiation Support Online : the Need for Developing BATNAs
Fisher & Ury claim that an important step in resolving a dispute is to be aware of one’s BATNA – what alternative parties have if negotiation fails. Providing accurate information is important,Expand
Knowledge Management in the Construction Industry: Integration between Research and Practice
The construction industry is characterized by the production of massive number of documents in different formats. Successful completion of projects is highly dependent on efficient communication ofExpand
Negotiating About Charges and Pleas: Balancing Interests and Justice
There is a worldwide movement towards alternatives to judicial decision-making for legal disputes. In the domain of criminal sentencing, in Western countries more than 95 % of cases are guilty pleas,Expand
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 31 REFERENCES
The IKBALS project: Multi-modal reasoning in legal knowledge based systems
TLDR
The rule based part of the system which provides advice on the Credit Act has been commercially developed in conjunction with a legal firm and it is indicated how this work has lead to the development of a methodology for constructing rule based legal knowledge based systems. Expand
Using Web-based Legal Decision Support Systems to Improve Access to Justice
TLDR
Tools for building web-based legal decision support systems are discussed and examples from the domains of Family Law and eligibility for legal aid are given to help litigants negotiate their disputes. Expand
Risk , negotiation and argumentation — a decision support system based approach
There has been very little published research on building legal decision support systems to perform risk assessment. Yet one of the principal goals of the law is to reduce risk through the avoidanceExpand
Building Decision Support Systems in Discretionary Legal Domains
The construction of intelligent legal decision support systems in discretionary domains will enhance consistent decision-making leading to increased confidence in the justice system and provideExpand
The integration of retrieval, reasoning and drafting for refugee law: a third generation legal knowledge based system
TLDR
An argument is identified to be the basic unit of reasoning of a system that supports the construction of arguments and drafting of determinations in refugee law and a classification of knowledge based systems in law is proposed. Expand
Copyright Regulation with Argumentation Agents
TLDR
This work applies an agent-based architecture that defines the actors, the knowledge all agents share about the world and a protocol, based on Habermasian speech acts to interact with other agents to regulate copyright on the internet. Expand
The Development and Rapid Evolution of the Knowledge Model of ADVOKATE: An Advisory System to Assess the Credibility of Eyewitness Testimony
ADVOKATE, a web-enabled knowledge base application operating in the forensic and legal domain, offers assistance to police and legal counsel in their task of assessing the credibility of potentialExpand
A hybrid rule – neural approach for the automation of legal reasoning in the discretionary domain of family law in Australia
TLDR
It is demonstrated that systems for reasoning with this form of open texture can be built by integrating rule sets with neural networks trained with data collected from standard past cases and difficulties associated with integrating two vastly different paradigms. Expand
The Credit Act Advisory System (CAAS): conversion from an expert system prototype to a C++ commercial system
TLDR
CAAS is a rule-based expert system, which provides advice on the Victorial Credit Act 1984 using an object-oriented hybrid reasoning approach, and is currently in commercial use. Expand
The split-up system: integrating neural networks and rule-based reasoning in the legal domain
TLDR
Hustrate the use of Toulrnin structures in the generation of explanations for conclusions reached by either mle sets or neural networks. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
...