An Attribution-Value Model of Prejudice: Anti-Fat Attitudes in Six Nations

@article{Crandall2001AnAM,
  title={An Attribution-Value Model of Prejudice: Anti-Fat Attitudes in Six Nations},
  author={Christian S. Crandall and Silvana D’Anello and Nuray Sakalli and Eleana Lazarus and Grazyna Wieczorkowska Nejtardt and Norman T. Feather},
  journal={Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin},
  year={2001},
  volume={27},
  pages={30 - 37}
}
The authors propose an Attribution-Value model of prejudice, which hypothesizes that people are prejudiced against groups that they feel have some negative attribute for which they are held responsible. The structure of prejudice against fat people was compared in six nations: Australia, India, Poland, Turkey, the United States of America, and Venezuela. Both a negative cultural value for fatness and a tendency to hold people responsible predicts anti-fat prejudice. Most important, a… Expand

Tables from this paper

Anti-Roma attitudes as expressions of dominant social norms in Eastern Europe
Abstract Although one of the most severe forms of bias all over Europe, anti-Roma prejudice has been neglected within social psychology. We argue that anti-Roma attitudes need to be recognized as aExpand
A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice.
The authors propose a justification-suppression model (JSM), which characterizes the processes that lead to prejudice expression and the experience of one's own prejudice. They suggest that "genuine"Expand
Application of the Attribution-Value Model of Prejudice to Homosexuality
  • N. Sakalli
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • The Journal of social psychology
  • 2002
Abstract According to the attribution-value model, prejudice toward a group stems from 2 interrelated variables: attributions of controllability and cultural value. Thus, prejudice toward gay men andExpand
Attributional Beliefs About the Controllability of Stigmatized Traits: Antecedents or Justifications of Prejudice?
Correlational studies show that prejudiced people attribute stigmatized traits to controllable causes, and blame stigmatized groups for their own fate. Attribution theory argues that causalExpand
Moral misfits: The role of moral judgments and emotions in derogating other groups
This dissertation investigates whether moral judgments regarding other groups’ character, behaviour, and attitudes affect prejudice and discriminatory intentions against these groups. Whether theseExpand
Attraction, personality, and prejudice: liking none of the people most of the time.
TLDR
Results suggest that prejudice can emerge from otherwise unprejudiced persons when situations permit justification, and patterns in negative evaluations are linked distinctively to the Big Five dimension of Agreeableness, proximal social cognition and motives, and discrimination. Expand
Ideology and Prejudice
TLDR
Three studies tested whether prejudice derives from perceived similarities and dissimilarities in political ideologies and found symmetrical preferences, with liberals and conservatives each liking attitudinally similar targets more than dissimilar targets. Expand
The Nature and Implications of Implicit Weight Bias
Although overweight is undesirable from both public and personal health perspectives, the focus of this paper is on exploring the nature of fat prejudice within a social cognition framework. FatExpand
U.S. Culturally specific prejudices: Interpersonal prejudices of individualists and intergroup prejudices of collectivists
The authors propose that the nature of prejudice differs across cultures. A model is introduced that proposes that the interpersonal perspective associated with individualist cultures (Westerners)Expand
How Do People React to Stigma Acknowledgment? Race and Gender Acknowledgment in the Context of the 2008 Presidential Election
Some studies have found that acknowledging one's stigmatized social identity in an evaluative context leads to more favorable evaluations, whereas others have found that stigma acknowledgment canExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 28 REFERENCES
Prejudice against fat people: ideology and self-interest.
  • C. Crandall
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Journal of personality and social psychology
  • 1994
TLDR
Fatism appears to behave much like symbolic racism, but with less of the negative social desirability of racism, and three commonalities between antifat attitudes and racism were explored. Expand
Culture, Ideology, and Antifat Attitudes
Research on antifat attitudes in the United States has shown the position of antifat attitudes in an ideological network and the importance of attributions of control to prejudice against fat people.Expand
Conservatism and Perceptions of Poverty: An Attributional Analysis1
Attribution theory was used to relate causal explanations for poverty to affect and behavioral intentions. In Experiment 1, student subjects rated 13 causes of poverty on importance, the attributionExpand
The stigma of overweight: affective consequences of attributional ambiguity.
TLDR
Dimensions of stigma that may account for differences in the tendency to attribute negative outcomes to prejudice, and implications for weight loss programs and psychotherapy for the overweight, are discussed. Expand
The Ideology of Anti‐Fat Attitudes1
We surveyed over 1,000 undergraduates about their attitudes toward fatness and fat people. A consistent pattern of attitudes emerged: People who were anti-fat shared an ideologically conservativeExpand
The Linguistic Intergroup Bias As an Implicit Indicator of Prejudice
The Linguistic Intergroup Bias (LIB) is the tendency to describe stereotypic events in more abstract terms than counterstereotypic events. We examined whether a paper-and-pencil measure based on theExpand
When ideology hurts: effects of belief in the protestant ethic and feeling overweight on the psychological well-being of women.
TLDR
PE ideology as a vulnerability factor for the psychological well-being of the overweight is discussed and primed within the context of the stigma of overweight was discussed. Expand
An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas.
TLDR
This work examined the perceived controllability and stability of the causes of 10 stigmas and ascertained the affective reactions of pity and anger, helping judgments, and the efficacy of five intervention techniques guided by attribution theory. Expand
Providing public assistance: Cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences.
Previous research in a wide variety of policy domains (e.g., azidothymidine for AIDS patients, lowincome housing) has indicated that under no scarcity, liberals tend to help all claimants forExpand
The ‘ultimate attribution error’? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution
Studies that examine causal attributions for acts by ingroup and outgroup members are reviewed. The tendency for attributions to favour ingroup over outgroup members is found in three paradigms —Expand
...
1
2
3
...