An Analysis of Potential Ethical Justifications for Mammoth De-extinction And a Call for Empirical Research

@article{Rohwer2018AnAO,
  title={An Analysis of Potential Ethical Justifications for Mammoth De-extinction And a Call for Empirical Research},
  author={Yasha Rohwer and Emma Marris},
  journal={Ethics, Policy \& Environment},
  year={2018},
  volume={21},
  pages={127 - 142}
}
Abstract We argue that the de-extinction of the mammoth cannot be ethically grounded by duties to the extinct mammoth, to ecosystem health or to individual organisms in ecosystems missing the mammoth. However, the action can be shown to be morally permissible via the goods it will afford humans, including advances in scientific knowledge, valuable experiences of awe and pleasure, and perhaps improvements to our moral character or behaviour—if and only if suffering is minimal. Finally, we call… 

Won’t Somebody Please Think of the Mammoths? De-extinction and Animal Welfare

Though most of the proposed benefits of these projects are insufficient to outweigh the current potential welfare harm, these problems may be overcome with further development of the technology and careful selection of appropriate species as de-extinction candidates.

Creating proxies of extinct species: the bioethics of de-extinction.

The technical scope, the uncertainties, and some of the bioethical issues raised by the future prospect of de-extinction are considered.

Why Wake the Dead? Identity and De-extinction

  • C. Lean
  • Environmental Science, Philosophy
  • 2020
I will entertain and reject three arguments which putatively establish that the individuals produced through de-extinction ought to be the same species as the extinct population. Forms of these

Does Justice Require De-extinction of the Heath Hen?

  • Jennifer Welchman
  • Philosophy
    The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics
  • 2021
It is often argued that we “owe it” to species driven to extinction “to bring them back.” Can justice really require us to make restitution for anthropogenic extinctions? Can it require

De-Extinction

A comprehensive definition of de-extinction practice and rationale is presented that expounds and reconciles the biological and ecological inconsistencies in the IUCN definition and refers to species falsely considered extinct as “evolutionarily torpid species”.

On the Horns of a Dilemma: Let the Northern White Rhino Vanish or Intervene?

  • C. Callender
  • Environmental Science
    Ethics, Policy & Environment
  • 2021
Two females, Nadine and Fatu, are the sole surviving Northern White Rhinos (NWR). The subspecies is functionally extinct. Hope for NWR now lies in emerging reproductive and genetic technologies,

Anabiosis and the Liminal Geographies of De/extinction

  • A. Searle
  • Geography
    Environmental Humanities
  • 2020
The spectacle of de-extinction is often forward facing at the interface of science fiction and speculative fact, haunted by extinction’s pasts. Missing from this discourse, however, is a robust

Exploring the intersections of governance, constituencies, and risk in genetic interventions

In June 2020, Revive & Restore hosted the Intended Consequences Workshop to explore how the field of conservation can realize the benefits of genetic interventions and address concerns about

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 59 REFERENCES

The Ethics of Reviving Long Extinct Species

  • R. Sandler
  • Environmental Science
    Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
  • 2014
An ethical analysis of de-extinction of long extinct species finds that legitimate ecological, political, animal welfare, legal, or human health concerns associated with a de- Extinction (and reintroduction) must be thoroughly addressed for it to be ethically acceptable.

A mammoth undertaking: harnessing insight from functional ecology to shape de‐extinction priority setting

Three ways that de-extinction may more meaningfully restore the functioning of once-extinct species are suggested: select target species from guilds with low functional redundancy; concentrate on species that went extinct recently rather than older extinctions; and only work with species that can be restored to levels of abundance that meanfully restore ecological function.

What If Extinction Is Not Forever?

Although new technologies may make it possible to bring extinct species back to life, there are ethical, legal, and social ramifications to be addressed A 1930s film shows a dog running and jumping

Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics - 25th Anniversary Edition

What rational justification is there for conceiving of all living things as possessing inherent worth? In Respect for Nature, Paul Taylor draws on biology, moral philosophy, and environmental science

The Restorationist Argument for Extinction Reversal

The genome of the extinct woolly mammoth has been sequenced for the first time, and the public discussion, however, has focused on the prospects for reversing past extinctions.

The ethics of animal re-creation and modification : reviving, rewilding, restoring

Biodiversity and the Value of Human InvolvementMarkku Oksanen Epilogue Helena Siipi and Markku Oskanen Index.

Captivity for Conservation? Zoos at a Crossroads

The paper explains why the ‘Noah's Ark’ paradigm is being replaced by an alternative ‘integrated approach’ and explores the changes in the zoo’s core tasks that the new paradigm implies, with special attention to the changes that would have to be made in zoos’ collection policies.

How to Clone a Mammoth: The Science of De-Extinction

The conceit of this disturbing, thoughtful book is that it is a how-to manual, a cookbook for wannabe lords of (re)creation. Nine of the eleven chapters cover steps in the process of bringing an

Rewinding the process of mammalian extinction.

The ideas discussed here, while centered on the northern white rhinoceros, are equally applicable, after proper adjustments, to other mammals on the brink of extinction.

Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics

Paul Taylor’s Respect for Nature was first published 1986 when environmental ethics was a relatively new field. In it he defended a deontological biocentric environmental ethic predicated on the idea
...