An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research

@article{Wagenmakers2012AnAF,
  title={An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research},
  author={Eric-Jan Wagenmakers and Ruud Wetzels and D. Borsboom and Han L. J. van der Maas and Rogier A Kievit},
  journal={Perspectives on Psychological Science},
  year={2012},
  volume={7},
  pages={632 - 638}
}
  • Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Ruud Wetzels, +2 authors Rogier A Kievit
  • Published 2012
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • The veracity of substantive research claims hinges on the way experimental data are collected and analyzed. In this article, we discuss an uncomfortable fact that threatens the core of psychology’s academic enterprise: almost without exception, psychologists do not commit themselves to a method of data analysis before they see the actual data. It then becomes tempting to fine tune the analysis to the data in order to obtain a desired result—a procedure that invalidates the interpretation of the… CONTINUE READING
    527 Citations

    Figures and Topics from this paper

    Explore Further: Topics Discussed in This Paper

    There's more than one way to conduct a replication study: Beyond statistical significance.
    • 76
    • PDF
    Open Peer Commentary
    Psychology's Renaissance
    • 144
    • PDF
    From Discovery to Justification: Outline of an Ideal Research Program in Empirical Psychology
    • 8
    • PDF
    Flexible yet fair: blinding analyses in experimental psychology
    • 5
    • PDF
    A purely confirmatory replication study of structural brain-behavior correlations
    • 118
    • PDF
    Addressing the theory crisis in psychology.
    • 32
    • PDF

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 50 REFERENCES
    Must psychologists change the way they analyze their data?
    • 79
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    False-Positive Psychology
    • 3,476
    • PDF
    A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values
    • 1,567
    • PDF
    The Rules of the Game Called Psychological Science
    • 494
    • PDF
    Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On?
    • Z. Dienes
    • Psychology, Medicine
    • Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
    • 2011
    • 675
    • PDF
    Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping
    • 2,128
    • PDF
    Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
    • 4,511
    • PDF