Amniotic membrane inlay and overlay grafting for corneal epithelial defects and stromal ulcers.


OBJECTIVES To determine the effect of amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) on persistent corneal epithelial defects (PEDs) and to compare the efficacy between inlay and overlay techniques. METHODS Thirty patients (30 eyes) underwent AMT for PED. The use of AMT was restricted to patients in whom all previous measures, including bandage contact lens and tarsorrhaphy, had failed. The amniotic membrane was placed on the surface of the cornea in overlay (group A) or inlay (group B) fashion. RESULTS The PED healed after the first AMT in 21 eyes (70%) within an average of 25.5 days after surgery and recurred in 6 eyes (29%). Among the 22 eyes treated with an overlay AMT (group A), the PED healed after the first AMT in 14 eyes (64%) within an average of 24.5 days and recurred in 4 eyes (29%). Among the 8 eyes treated with an inlay AMT (group B), the PED healed within an average of 27.4 days after AMT, which did not statistically significantly differ from group A (P = .72). The PED healed after the first AMT in 7 eyes (88%) and recurred in 2 (29%) of 7 eyes. CONCLUSIONS The AMT can be helpful in the treatment of PED in which all other conventional management has failed. However, the success rate in our study was not as high as that previously reported, and our results showed a high incidence of recurrences of epithelial defects. We did not find any difference between overlay and inlay techniques in terms of healing time and recurrence rate.

2 Figures and Tables

Citations per Year

202 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 202 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Letko2001AmnioticMI, title={Amniotic membrane inlay and overlay grafting for corneal epithelial defects and stromal ulcers.}, author={Erik Letko and S U Stechschulte and Kenneth R. Kenyon and Nader Sadeq and Thiago R.L Romero and Charles M. Samson and Quan D. Nguyen and Stacy L Harper and Jonathan D Primack and Dimitri T. Azar and M Gruterich and Claes Henrik Dohlman and Stefanos Baltatzis and Charles Stephen Foster}, journal={Archives of ophthalmology}, year={2001}, volume={119 5}, pages={659-63} }