Ambivalence towards meat

@article{Berndsen2004AmbivalenceTM,
  title={Ambivalence towards meat},
  author={M. Berndsen and J. Pligt},
  journal={Appetite},
  year={2004},
  volume={42},
  pages={71-78}
}
The purpose of the present study was to examine whether differences in ambivalence between meat eaters affect their attitude towards eating meat, the belief structure underlying these attitudes, meat consumption, and intentions to reduce consumption in the future. Not surprisingly, more ambivalent meat eaters held a less positive attitude towards meat as compared to less ambivalent meat eaters. Moreover, the belief structure of the two groups also differed: More ambivalent persons associated… Expand
114 Citations

Tables and Topics from this paper

Risks of meat: the relative impact of cognitive, affective and moral concerns
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 32 REFERENCES
Ambivalence about health-related behaviours: an exploration in the domain of food choice.
Influences on meat consumption in Australia
Influences on Meat Avoidance Among British Students
Ambivalence and Attitudes
Attitudinal Ambivalence: A Test of Three Key Hypotheses
...
1
2
3
4
...