Ambivalence towards meat

  title={Ambivalence towards meat},
  author={Mari{\"e}tte Berndsen and Joop van der Pligt},

Tables from this paper

Meating Conflict: Toward a Model of Ambivalence-Motivated Reduction of Meat Consumption
An increasing number of people are concerned about eating meat, despite enjoying doing so. In the present research, we examined whether the desire to resolve this ambivalence about eating meat leads
Assessing the Causal Relationships among Hedonic belief, Ambivalence, Subjective norm, Attitude and Meat Consumption Behavior
The purpose of this study was to assess the causal relationships among hedonic belief, ambivalence, subjective norm, attitude and meat consumption behavior. A total of 318 questionnaires were
Implicit attitudes towards meat and vegetables in vegetarians and nonvegetarians
Previous research, in which self‐report measures were used, showed that vegetarians have more negative beliefs about meat than nonvegetarians. An important limitation of this research is that it did
How Normal Meat Becomes Stranger as Cultured Meat Becomes More Normal; Ambivalence and Ambiguity Below the Surface of Behavior
Although the majority of people still behave like happy meat eaters, there are good reasons to think that many are in fact ambivalent about meat. Following up on earlier findings, in this paper we
Making More Sustainable Food Choices One Meal at a Time: Psychological and Practical Aspects of Meat Reduction and Substitution
Switching out meat in favour of plant-based alternatives such as meat substitutes is an important step towards eating more sustainably. Here, the aim was to identify and explore the specific barriers


Ambivalence about health-related behaviours: an exploration in the domain of food choice.
The research supports the widespread view that ambivalence is an important issue, both for those involved in basic attitude research and for those who seek to use attitude theories in applied research, and indicates thatAmbivalence may often have implications for the predictive ability of attitude-intention-behaviour models, especially when applied to health-related behaviours that are characterized by motivational conflicts.
Influences on Meat Avoidance Among British Students
Chicken and turkey were the least often avoided flesh foods among men and women, and the only clear gradation from flesh-eating to vegetarianism was eating poultry and either beef/lamb or pork, eating only poultry and eating neither.
Ambivalence and Attitudes
This chapter explores the concept of ambivalence and its relationship to attitudes. Definitions and different measures of ambivalence are reviewed. We present three dimensions on which measures of
Effects of Attitudinal Ambivalence on Information Processing and Attitude-Intention Consistency☆
Abstract We hypothesize that, when encountering a new or unfamiliar attitude object that has both positiveandnegative attributes, such evaluatively inconsistent information leads toattitudinal
Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: when and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable?
The relation between conflicting evaluations of attitude objects (potential ambivalence) and associated unpleasant feelings (felt ambivalences) was investigated and similarities of ambivalent and cognitive dissonance constructs are discussed.
Anticipated regret and time perspective: Changing sexual risk-taking behavior.
In two studies we test the effects of anticipated affective reactions such as regret on behavioral expectations and behavior. These effects were examined in the context of sexual risk-taking
The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence.
This research examined the relationship between the measured and manipulated positive and negative bases of attitudes and the psychological experience of attitudinal ambivalence and the gradual threshold model of ambivalences was advanced.
Health-related beliefs and dietary practices among vegetarians and vegans: a qualitative study
It is suggested that while health motives are not necessarily the dom inant ones for the majority of this group of respondents, for many of those interviewed the per ceived health advantages represent significant ad ditional benefits of vegetarianism, benefits which complement and confirm their ethical stance.
On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique.
This article explores the alternate meanings of attitudinal neutrality in the context of the bipolarity-reciprocal antagonism issue. Specifically, it proposes a modification of the semantic
Attitude strength : antecedents and consequences
Contents: P.E. Converse, Foreword. Preface. J.A. Krosnick, R.E. Petty, Attitude Strength: An Overview. R.P. Abelson, Attitude Extremity. C.M. Judd, M. Brauer, Repetition and Evaluative Extremity. A.