Amalgam or composite fillings — which material lasts longer?

  title={Amalgam or composite fillings — which material lasts longer?},
  author={Dominic Hurst},
  journal={Evidence-Based Dentistry},
  • D. Hurst
  • Published 1 June 2014
  • Medicine
  • Evidence-Based Dentistry
Data sourcesCochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline, Embase and LILACS. Hand searched relevant journals and attempted contact with authors of unpublished studies and manufacturers.Study selectionRandomised controlled trials comparing dental resin composites with dental amalgams in permanent posterior teeth with a minimum follow up of three years were eligible.Data extraction and synthesisData were extracted… 

Clinical Effects of Mercury in Conservative Dentistry: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

There are not enough data to support the hypothesis that restorations with dental amalgam can cause nephrotoxicity when compared with composite resins restoration, according to the existing evidence.

Trend of posterior teeth restoration at ibadan, Nigeria.

The use of amalgam as choice material for restoration of posterior teeth is gradually being replaced by composite in the authors' environment which emphasizes the need to ensure the quality and durability of the composites used.

Restorative Direct Management of Cavitated Proximal Carious Lesions of Permanent Molars using Elastic Separators in Children and Adolescents

Restorative management of cavitated proximal carious surfaces of permanent teeth with amalgam or composite resin, using elastic separators, seems to be a very good and promising alternative technique in the context of the minimal invasive dentistry in children and adolescents.

of posterior restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials and prospective and retrospective studies comparing the failures rates between occlusal andocclusoproximal amalgam and composite resin posterior restorations found no difference.


Class II composite restorations appear to be associated with periodontal breakdown more than class II amalgam restoration, while there is no statistically significant decrease in GI, PPD and CAL scores between both groups.

Practice-based analysis of direct posterior dental restorations performed in a public health service: Retrospective long-term survival in Brazil

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the survival and associated factors for the longevity of direct posterior restorations and to verify whether the geographic location of public

Analysis of Composite Resin Treatment Pattern Changes After the Insurance Coverage

There was a significant change in frequency of resin restoration by shape of cavity comparing before and after the insurance coverage, whereas there was no significant difference in changes by patient age, gender and position of tooth.

Perceptions of dental therapy students regarding the teaching and training with dental amalgam, in a dental school in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Dental amalgam has been the material ofchoice for patients presenting with large tooth decay areas, including the loss of cuspal areas, making it more feasible and material of choice in lower economic countries, including South Africa.

Safety of Dental Restorative Materials – A Survey among Undergraduate Dental Students

The level of perception of some respondents towards amalgam related and other restorative materials related issues was found to be improved, participants with a better perception and attitude are having more knowledge and awareness towards safety of dental restorative Materials.



The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial.

Although the overall difference in longevity was not statistically significant, compomer was replaced significantly more frequently owing to recurrent caries, and composite restorations required seven times as many repairs as did amalgam restorATIONS.

Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial.

Use of amalgam appears to be preferable to use of composites in multisurface restorations of large posterior teeth if longevity is the primary criterion in material selection.