Air Force Strategic Planning: Past, Present, and Future

  title={Air Force Strategic Planning: Past, Present, and Future},
  author={Raphael S. Cohen},
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Tradeoffs in defense strategic planning: lessons from the U.S. Quadrennial Defense Review
ABSTRACT Defense ministries conduct strategic planning in various ways. In this article I outline tradeoffs in the design of strategic planning processes, and consider the implications of these
Strategic Planning and the U.S. Air Force: Characteristics of Success
The U.S. Air Force has embarked on a new round of strategic planning under the auspices of its 2015 Strategic Master Plan (SMP). This report represents a general survey of the state of the art in
The Department of Defense Posture for Artificial Intelligence: Assessment and Recommendations
In this report, the authors assess the state of artificial intelligence (AI) relevant to DoD and address misconceptions about it; conduct an independent and introspective assessment of the Department


An Air Force Strategy for the Long Haul
Abstract : This monograph discusses the current state of the United States Air Force and how it can better align its institutional identity and force posture to the future security environment. It
Preparing for the Future: Strategic Planning in the U.S. Air Force
While the Clinton Administration and federal agencies were busy making government cost less and work better in the near-term, the United States Air Force was regularly visualizing the competencies
Let me start with the conclusion: Michael Barzelay and Colin Campbell have written an excellent book describing and analyzing how the U.S. Air Force went about preparing for the future in the 1990s
Global Reach-Global Power: Air Force Strategic Vision, Past and Future
Abstract : The analysis presented in this thesis evaluates the contents of past Air Force strategic vision documents and studies the process used to create such documents. The thesis argument is that
Building Partnership Capacity: Operation Harmattan and Beyond
Abstract : The Air Force Association is planning a remarkable panel discussion Close Cooperation among Allies as part of its National Convention and Air and Space Conference near Washington, DC, in
Air Force Doctrine Problems 1926-Present
Abstract : The doctrinal history of the United States Air Force has been short and troubled. The Air Force first tried to write doctrine in the aftermath of World War I, while still an organic part
Long–Range Corporate Strategic Planning in Government Organizations: The Case of the U.S. Air Force
Since 1994, the United States Air Force has undertaken two major reviews of its long–range corporate strategy. Both exercises stretched very substantially beyond the previous horizons for such
Over Not Through: The Search for a Strong, Unified Culture for America's Airmen
Abstract : At the beginning of his tenure, the 18th Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS), General Martin Dempsey, published America s Military A Profession of Arms. He observed in this piece
Global Reach-Global Power and the USAF Tactical Air Forces
Abstract : In June 1990, the Secretary of the Air Force, Donald B. Rice, issued a Department of the Air Force White Paper entitled The Air Force and U.S. National Security: Global Reach Global Power
Rise of the Fighter Generals: The Problem of Air Force Leadership, 1945-1982
Abstract : Numerous studies have focused on American airpower, particularly since it became a dominant force in modern warfare. Yet, only a handful of these studies have offered a critical evaluation