• DOI:10.7249/RR1765
• Corpus ID: 114592099

Air Force Strategic Planning: Past, Present, and Future

@inproceedings{Cohen2017AirFS,
  title={Air Force Strategic Planning: Past, Present, and Future},
  author={Raphael S. Cohen},
  year={2017}
}

• Raphael S. Cohen
• Published 22 March 2017
• Political Science

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. R® is a registered trademark. iii Preface For a relatively young service, the U.S. Air Force has a remarkably rich intellectual history. Even before the Air Force's official formation, the development of airpower has been dotted with such visionaries as Billy Mitchell and Henry " Hap " Arnold. The trend continued after the service's formation with such airmen as John Boyd, Richard " Moody " Suter, and John Warden, who were years, if not decades, ahead of their time. At the same time, however, the Air Force's long-term plans have not always proved particularly farsighted or even notable. Indeed, many of the Air Force's senior leaders are skeptical of long-term strategic planning, and some even question why public strategies are produced altogether. 1 This study, conducted in RAND Project AIR FORCE's Strategy and Doctrine Program, asks the following question: With the Air Force facing increasing pressure to cut its headquarters staff, are public strategic-planning documents worth the time and energy required to produce them? It looks at what the Air Force has gotten out of its previous strategic-planning efforts. This report examines the evolution of Air Force strategic documents, particularly those produced after the Cold War. The report studies the purpose for these various strategies, the process by which they were created, and the effect these documents had on the service and other key constituencies. It concludes with lessons for Air Force leaders in developing future strategies. 2 This report should be of value to the national security community and interested members of the general public, especially those with an interest in strategic plans and the history of the …