Aha! experiences leave a mark: facilitated recall of insight solutions

@article{Danek2013AhaEL,
  title={Aha! experiences leave a mark: facilitated recall of insight solutions},
  author={Amory H. Danek and Thomas Fraps and Albrecht von M{\"u}ller and Benedikt Grothe and Michael {\"O}llinger},
  journal={Psychological Research},
  year={2013},
  volume={77},
  pages={659-669}
}
The present study investigates a possible memory advantage for solutions that were reached through insightful problem solving. We hypothesized that insight solutions (with Aha! experience) would be remembered better than noninsight solutions (without Aha! experience). 34 video clips of magic tricks were presented to 50 participants as a novel problem-solving task, asking them to find out how the trick was achieved. Upon discovering the solution, participants had to indicate whether they had… 

Closing the gap: connecting sudden representational change to the subjective Aha! experience in insightful problem solving

TLDR
The results show a connection between sudden changes in problem representations (leading to correct solutions) and the subjective appraisal of solutions as an Aha! experience, offering the first empirical support for a close relationship between two theoretical constructs that have traditionally been assumed to be related to insightful problem solving.

How Difficult Was It? Metacognitive Judgments About Problems and Their Solutions After the Aha Moment

The insight phenomenon is thought to comprise two components: cognitive and affective (the Aha! experience). The exact nature of the Aha! experience remains unclear; however, several explanations

What about False Insights? Deconstructing the Aha! Experience along Its Multiple Dimensions for Correct and Incorrect Solutions Separately

TLDR
Findings cast some doubt on the assumption that the occurrence of an Aha! experience can serve as a definitive signal that a true insight has taken place, and the quantitative and qualitative differences in the experience of correct and incorrect solutions demonstrate that the Aha!. experience is not a mere epiphenomenon.

Intuitive Feelings of Warmth and Confidence in Insight and Noninsight Problem Solving of Magic Tricks

TLDR
The results have implications for understanding people's metacognitive awareness of the cognitive processes involved in problem solving and have general implications for the understanding of how intuition and insight are related.

Generation and the subjective feeling of “aha!” are independently related to learning from insight

TLDR
It is found that the generation effect was larger for indirect testing, reflecting more automatic retrieval processes, while the relationship with the occurrence of an “aha!” experience was somewhat larger for direct testing.

Solving Classical Insight Problems Without Aha! Experience: 9 Dot, 8 Coin, and Matchstick Arithmetic Problems

TLDR
It is demonstrated that in many cases participants do solve these classical insight problems without any Aha! experience, and the importance of obtaining insight ratings from participants to determine whether any given problem is solved with insight or not.

Problem solving of magic tricks: guiding to and through an impasse with solution cues

TLDR
This study investigated how problem solvers get into and out of a state of impasse while solving difficult problems, and found that cues helped to overcome the impasse, with higher solution rates for pictorial than for verbal cues and both higher than a no cue condition.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 64 REFERENCES

Feeling of knowing in memory and problem solving.

This study investigates feelings of knowing for problem solving and memory. In Experiment 1 subjects judged their feelings of knowing to trivia questions they had been unable to answer, then

Investigating the effect of mental set on insight problem solving.

TLDR
Three experiments are presented that examine the extent to which sets of noninsight and insight problems affect the subsequent solutions of insight test problems and indicate a subtle interplay between mental set and insight.

“Aha!” effects in a guessing riddle task: An event‐related potential study

TLDR
High‐density event‐related potentials (ERPs) were recorded to examine the electrophysiologic correlates of insight problem solving and showed that Aha answers elicited a more negative ERP deflection than did No‐aha answers in the time window from 250–500 msec after onset of the answer.

The Prepared Mind

TLDR
The results for electroencephalographic topography and frequency suggest that non-insight preparation, in contrast, involves increased occipital activity consistent with an increase in externally directed visual attention, and general preparatory mechanisms modulate problem-solving strategy.

Neural Activity When People Solve Verbal Problems with Insight

TLDR
This work observed two objective neural correlates of insight: increased activity in the right hemisphere anterior superior temporal gyrus for insight relative to noninsight solutions and a sudden burst of high-frequency neural activity prior to insight solutions.

How to investigate insight: a proposal.

An eye movement study of insight problem solving

TLDR
The present study suggests that eye movement recordings provide an important new window into processes of insight problem solving, providing converging evidence with prior findings using solution rates and solution times.

“Aha!”: The neural correlates of verbal insight solutions

TLDR
Data indicate that verbal insight solutions activate a distributed neural network that includes bilateral activation in the insula, the right prefrontal cortex, and the anterior cingulate, which may play a role in evaluation and metacognition of insight solutions.

New approaches to demystifying insight

...