Aggregating Sets of Judgments: Two Impossibility Results Compared1

@article{List2004AggregatingSO,
  title={Aggregating Sets of Judgments: Two Impossibility Results Compared1},
  author={C. List and P. Pettit},
  journal={Synthese},
  year={2004},
  volume={140},
  pages={207-235}
}
The ``doctrinal paradox'' or ``discursive dilemma'' shows that propositionwise majority voting over the judgments held by multiple individuals on some interconnected propositions can lead to inconsistent collective judgments on these propositions. List and Pettit (2002) have proved that this paradox illustrates a more general impossibility theorem showing that there exists no aggregation procedure that generally produces consistent collective judgments and satisfies certain minimal conditions… Expand
192 Citations
Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result
  • 582
  • PDF
A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions
  • C. List
  • Mathematics, Computer Science
  • Math. Soc. Sci.
  • 2003
  • 88
  • PDF
The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions
  • C. List
  • Mathematics, Computer Science
  • Soc. Choice Welf.
  • 2005
  • 97
  • PDF
Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
  • G. Pigozzi
  • Mathematics, Computer Science
  • Synthese
  • 2006
  • 198
  • PDF
Behavioral evidence for framing effects in the resolution of the doctrinal paradox
  • 9
Arrow’s theorem in judgment aggregation
  • 268
  • PDF
Neutrality and relative acceptability in judgment aggregation
  • Highly Influenced
  • PDF
Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
  • F. Dietrich
  • Economics, Computer Science
  • J. Econ. Theory
  • 2006
  • 168
  • PDF
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 32 REFERENCES
Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result
  • 582
  • PDF
A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions
  • C. List
  • Mathematics, Computer Science
  • Math. Soc. Sci.
  • 2003
  • 88
  • PDF
Connecting and resolving Sen's and Arrow's theorems
  • 70
  • PDF
Utility in Social Choice
  • 172
The One and the Many: Adjudication in Collegial Courts
  • 221
  • PDF
Social Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy : A Reconciliation
  • 133
  • PDF
On frustration of the majority by fulfilment of the majority's will
  • 56
A Model of Path-Dependence in Decisions over Multiple Propositions
  • C. List
  • Economics, Computer Science
  • American Political Science Review
  • 2004
  • 124
  • PDF
On the Rationale of Group Decision-making
  • D. Black
  • Economics
  • Journal of Political Economy
  • 1948
  • 1,918
...
1
2
3
4
...