• DOI:10.1007/S11406-014-9575-1
• Corpus ID: 55901464

Against Zangwill’s Extreme Formalism About Inorganic Nature

@article{Xu2015AgainstZE,
  title={Against Zangwill’s Extreme Formalism About Inorganic Nature},
  author={Min Xu and Guifang Deng},
  journal={Philosophia},
  year={2015},
  volume={43},
  pages={249-257}
}

• Min Xu, Guifang Deng
• Published 1 March 2015
• Philosophy
• Philosophia

Extreme formalism is a radical and important position in the aesthetics of inorganic nature. Zangwill offers a new formulation of what formal aesthetic properties are, according to which a formal aesthetic property of a thing is an aesthetic property that is determined merely by its appearance properties. An appearance property of a thing is the way it seems if perceived under certain conditions. With the notion of formal aesthetic properties formulated as such, extreme formalism, the claim that all aesthetic properties of inorganic things are formal, says that all aesthetic properties of inorganic things are determined merely by their appearance properties. Recently, Zangwill defends extreme formalism by deflecting the famous counter-example of the cumulonimbus cloud given by Budd, and argues for extreme formalism by arguing against the idea of the existence of non-formal beauty in inorganic nature. In this paper, we argue that both his defense and positive arguments are not successful. If  our arguments are right, the burden of proof is still on Zangwill’s side.