Against Philosophical Anarchism

@article{Wendt2020AgainstPA,
  title={Against Philosophical Anarchism},
  author={Fabian Wendt},
  journal={Law and Philosophy},
  year={2020},
  volume={39},
  pages={1-18}
}
  • Fabian Wendt
  • Published 26 February 2020
  • Political Science
  • Law and Philosophy
Philosophical anarchists claim that all states lack political authority and are illegitimate, but that some states are nevertheless morally justified and should not be abolished. I argue that philosophical anarchism is either incoherent or collapses into either statism or political anarchism. 

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 36 REFERENCES
Justice and political authority in left-libertarianism
From a left-libertarian perspective, it seems almost impossible for states to acquire political authority. For that reason, left-libertarians like Peter Vallentyne understandably hope that states
Legitimacy is Not Authority
The two leading traditions of theorizing about democratic legitimacy are liberalism and deliberative democracy. Liberals typically claim that legitimacy consists in the consent of the governed, while
Political Legitimacy and Democracy*
The term ‘political legitimacy’ is unfortunately ambiguous. One serious source of confusion is the failure to distinguish clearly between political legitimacy and political authority and to conflate
Authority and Reason-Giving
The phenomenon of authority – political and otherwise – has rightly generated much philosophical attention. But this literature has failed to fully appreciate that authority is a particular instance
Is There a Prima Facie Obligation to Obey the Law
As against this, I suggest that it is not at all obvious that there is such an obligation, that this is something that must be shown, rather than so blithely assumed. Indeed, were he uninfluenced by
NATURAL RIGHTS AND POLITICAL LEGITIMACY
  • C. W. Morris
  • Political Science
    Social Philosophy and Policy
  • 2005
If we have a natural right to liberty, it is hard to see how a state could be legitimate without first obtaining the (genuine) consent of the governed. I consider the threat natural rights pose to
A Right to Violate One's Duty
I argue that it is conceptually possible to have a right to do something one has a duty not to do, and a duty to do something one has a right not to do. Acknowledging this possibility is crucial – so
Boundaries of Authority
Modern states claim rights of jurisdiction and control over particular geographical areas and their associated natural resources. Boundaries of Authority explores the possible moral bases for such
Liberalism, Samaritanism, and Political Legitimacy
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal,
The Idea of a Legitimate State
Analyse normative de la relation entre un etat criminel et la population et le territoire democratiques sur lequel il impose sa loi. Soulevant la question de l'autorite morale du gouvernement, l'A.
...
1
2
3
4
...