Against Philosophical Anarchism

  title={Against Philosophical Anarchism},
  author={Fabian Wendt},
  journal={Law and Philosophy},
  • Fabian Wendt
  • Published 26 February 2020
  • Philosophy
  • Law and Philosophy
Philosophical anarchists claim that all states lack political authority and are illegitimate, but that some states are nevertheless morally justified and should not be abolished. I argue that philosophical anarchism is either incoherent or collapses into either statism or political anarchism. 



Justice and political authority in left-libertarianism

From a left-libertarian perspective, it seems almost impossible for states to acquire political authority. For that reason, left-libertarians like Peter Vallentyne understandably hope that states

Is there a duty to obey the law

The article focuses on the problem of a political obligation, which stands for the (con­troversial) duty of a person, located within the borders of a given state, to obey the legalcommands of that

What if there are no political obligations? A reply to A. J. Simmons

Toward the beginning of the final chapter of Moral Principles and Political Obligations,' A. John Simmons concludes that for most people most of the time there are no political obligations over and

Legitimacy is Not Authority

The two leading traditions of theorizing about democratic legitimacy are liberalism and deliberative democracy. Liberals typically claim that legitimacy consists in the consent of the governed, while

Political Legitimacy and Democracy*

The term ‘political legitimacy’ is unfortunately ambiguous. One serious source of confusion is the failure to distinguish clearly between political legitimacy and political authority and to conflate

Authority and Reason-Giving

The phenomenon of authority – political and otherwise – has rightly generated much philosophical attention. But this literature has failed to fully appreciate that authority is a particular instance

Is There a Prima Facie Obligation to Obey the Law

As against this, I suggest that it is not at all obvious that there is such an obligation, that this is something that must be shown, rather than so blithely assumed. Indeed, were he uninfluenced by


If we have a natural right to liberty, it is hard to see how a state could be legitimate without first obtaining the (genuine) consent of the governed. I consider the threat natural rights pose to

A Right to Violate One's Duty

I argue that it is conceptually possible to have a right to do something one has a duty not to do, and a duty to do something one has a right not to do. Acknowledging this possibility is crucial – so

Boundaries of Authority

Modern states claim rights of jurisdiction and control over particular geographical areas and their associated natural resources. Boundaries of Authority explores the possible moral bases for such