After Citizens United: How Outside Spending Shapes American Democracy

@article{AbdulRazzak2019AfterCU,
  title={After Citizens United: How Outside Spending Shapes American Democracy},
  author={Nour Abdul-Razzak and Carlo G. Prato and Stephane Wolton},
  journal={PSN: Voters \& Elections (Topic)},
  year={2019}
}
This paper examines how lifting a ban on contributions from corporations and unions to groups engaging in outside spending (independent political advertising) affects electoral outcomes, representatives' ideology, and targeted public good provision. Using a differences-in-differences design, we find that removing constraints on the funding of outside spending improves the electoral chances of Republican candidates and leads to more conservative state legislatures. We also provide moderate… Expand
3 Citations
Does money have a conservative bias? Estimating the causal impact of Citizens United on state legislative preferences
Recent work has suggested that the US Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United (2010), eliminating restrictions on independent campaign expenditures, increased the election probabilities ofExpand
Campaign Finance in the Age of Super PACs
  • Christian Cox
  • Political Science
  • 2021
The United States Supreme Court 2010 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission led to a major de-regulation of election campaign finance law. A new political action committee emergedExpand
Campaign finance legislation and the supply-side of the revolving door
  • Simon Weschle
  • Political Science
  • Political Science Research and Methods
  • 2019
Abstract Existing research on the revolving door examines why employers hire former politicians. I complement this demand-side approach by demonstrating the importance of the supply-side. InExpand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 47 REFERENCES
Citizens United: A Theoretical Evaluation
Following the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court’s decision on Citizens United v FEC, interest groups engaging in outside spending can receive unlimited contributions from unions and corporations. Critics ofExpand
The Business of American Democracy: Citizens United, Independent Spending, and Elections
In Citizens United v. FEC (2010), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that restrictions on independent political expenditures by corporations and labor unions are unconstitutional. We analyze the effects ofExpand
Citizens United, States Divided: An Empirical Analysis of Independent Political Spending
What effect has Citizens United v. FEC had on independent spending in American politics? Previous attempts to answer this question have focused solely on federal elections where there is no baselineExpand
The effects of campaign finance spending bans on electoral outcomes: : Evidence from the states about the potential impact of "Citizens United v. FEC"
This paper seeks to understand the effect of campaign finance laws on electoral outcomes. Spurred by the recent Supreme Court decision, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010), whichExpand
Appropriators not Position Takers: The Distorting Effects of Electoral Incentives on Congressional Representation
Congressional districts create two levels of representation. Studies of representation focus on a disaggregated level: the electoral connection between representatives and constituents. But there isExpand
Ideological Donors, Contribution Limits, and the Polarization of American Legislatures
This article demonstrates that limits on campaign contributions—which alter a candidate’s ability to raise money from certain types of donors—affect the ideologies of legislators in office. Using anExpand
Voting Against Your Constituents? How Lobbying Affects Representation
Citizens delegate the representation of their political preferences to members of Parliament (MPs), who are supposed to represent their interests in the legislature. However, MPs are exposed to aExpand
Looking for Influence in All the Wrong Places: How Studying Subnational Policy Can Revive Research on Interest Groups
The American politics literature on representation focuses on voters and elected officials, but a growing group of political scientists are arguing that more should be done to study interest groups.Expand
Special Interest Politics
This landmark theoretical book is about the mechanisms by which special interest groups affect policy in modern democracies. Defining a special interest group as any organization that takes action onExpand
Do Political Protests Matter? Evidence from the Tea Party Movement*
Can protests cause political change, or are they merely symptoms of underlying shifts in policy preferences? We address this question by studying the Tea Party movement in the United States, whichExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...