Affective basis of judgment-behavior discrepancy in virtual experiences of moral dilemmas

  title={Affective basis of judgment-behavior discrepancy in virtual experiences of moral dilemmas},
  author={Indrajeet Patil and Carlotta Cogoni and Nicola Zangrando and Luca Chittaro and Giorgia Silani},
  journal={Social Neuroscience},
  pages={107 - 94}
Although research in moral psychology in the last decade has relied heavily on hypothetical moral dilemmas and has been effective in understanding moral judgment, how these judgments translate into behaviors remains a largely unexplored issue due to the harmful nature of the acts involved. To study this link, we follow a new approach based on a desktop virtual reality environment. In our within-subjects experiment, participants exhibited an order-dependent judgment-behavior discrepancy across… 
Virtual Morality: Transitioning from Moral Judgment to Moral Action?
Virtual Reality (VR) moral paradigms examining the action individuals take in a high emotionally arousing, direct action-focused, moral scenario are introduced and suggest that moral action may be viewed as an independent construct to moral judgment.
Moral Cognition About Harm in Anxiety Disorders: The Importance of Experienced Emotion
The findings support past work indicating that moral cognition is intact in anxiety disorders despite the emotional dysregulation characteristic of anxious psychopathology and support the Dual Process Theory model’s prediction that decreased utilitarian responding will be concomitant with an increased emotional arousal.
Distrusting Your Moral Compass: The Impact of Distrust Mindsets on Moral Dilemma Processing and Judgments
A growing literature suggests that generalized distrust mindsets encourage carefully considering alternatives—yet it remains unclear whether this pertains to moral decision making. We propose that
Physical Presence during Moral Action in Immersive Virtual Reality
It is found that participants referred significantly more often to abstract principles and consequences for themselves after the paper-based moral dilemma compared to the IVR dilemma, suggesting that decision and action might be different moral concepts with different foci regarding moral reasoning.
The Influence of Situational Factors in Sacrificial Dilemmas on Utilitarian Moral Judgments
  • M. Klenk
  • Psychology
    Review of Philosophy and Psychology
  • 2019
The standard way to test alternative descriptive theories of moral judgment is by asking subjects to evaluate (amongst others) sacrificial dilemmas, where acting classifies as a utilitarian moral
How Emotions Shape Moral Behavior: Some Answers (and Questions) for the Field of Moral Psychology
Within the past decade, the field of moral psychology has begun to disentangle the mechanics behind moral judgments, revealing the vital role that emotions play in driving these processes. However,
Framing the outcome of moral dilemmas: effects of emotional information
The present study was aimed at investigating whether and how the explicit representation of the decision outcome, framed in terms of lives saved or lost, could affect decision choices, emotional
An investigation into the effects of social influence on moral behaviour using immersive virtual reality
Much of the research surrounding social influence investigates its effects in specifically non-moral situations while almost no research has looked at its effects during moral emergencies. At the


An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment
It is argued that moral dilemmas vary systematically in the extent to which they engage emotional processing and that these variations in emotional engagement influence moral judgment.
A Dissociation Between Moral Judgments and Justifications
To what extent do moral judgments depend on conscious reasoning from explicitly understood principles? We address this question by investigating one particular moral principle, the principle of the
A Dissociation Between Moral Judgments and Justification
To what extent do moral judgments depend on conscious reasoning from explicitly understood principles? We address this question by investigating one particular moral principle, the principle of the
Emotion and moral judgment.
A review of research findings that are in line with three increasingly strong claims about the role of emotion in moral judgment, highlighting recurring themes across these three categories of evidence, and identifying some open questions and areas for future research.
Time and moral judgment
Discrepancies between Judgment and Choice of Action in Moral Dilemmas
Whether judgment and choice of action differ when people make decisions on dilemmas involving moral issues is explored, which argues in favor of each of them being supported by (at least partially) different psychological processes.
The Role of Moral Commitments in Moral Judgment
An experiment with 336 participants finds that individuals vary in the extent to which their moral commitments are consequentialist or deontological, and that this variation is systematically but imperfectly related to the moral judgments elicited by trolley car problems.
A Psychophysiological Investigation of Moral Judgment after Ventromedial Prefrontal Damage
Replicating previous evidence, vmPFC patients approved more personal moral violations than did controls while skin conductance response was measured as a somatic index of affective state and provided direct support to the hypothesis that thevmPFC promotes moral behavior by mediating the anticipation of the emotional consequences of personalmoral violations.