Affective Influence on Judgments and Decisions: Moving towards Core Mechanisms

@article{Winkielman2007AffectiveIO,
  title={Affective Influence on Judgments and Decisions: Moving towards Core Mechanisms},
  author={Piotr Winkielman and Brian Knutson and Martin P. Paulus and Jennifer L. Trujillo},
  journal={Review of General Psychology},
  year={2007},
  volume={11},
  pages={179 - 192}
}
This article reviews psychological accounts of affective influence on judgments and decisions and argues that these accounts can be enriched by insights from biopsychology. The authors show how biopsychological research helps (1) reveal the sources of values and feelings; (2) predict when affect will influence attentional, perceptual, memorial, and decision processes; and (3) identify precise mechanisms underlying the interaction between affective and cognitive systems. The authors also propose… 

Figures from this paper

The influence of emotions on cognitive control: feelings and beliefs—where do they meet?

TLDR
A computational framework to conceptualize emotional influences on inhibitory control, an important building block of executive functioning, is provided and how Bayesian ideal observer models can help reframe inhibitoryControl as a dynamic decision-making process is shown.

The Effects of Unconsciously Derived Affect on Task Satisfaction and Performance

PurposeTheoretical and empirical evidence from basic psychological research suggests that much of affective processing occurs outside of conscious awareness and that this unconscious processing can

Emotional evidence and jurors' judgments: the promise of neuroscience for informing psychology and law.

TLDR
Neuroimaging evidence showing that emotional stimuli cause heightened emotion and decreased effortful cognitive processing is relevant in understanding jurors' increased punitiveness after being exposed to emotional evidence, and in turn relevant to debates about the admissibility of emotional evidence in courts of law.

Influence of Suboptimally and Optimally Presented Affective Pictures and Words on Consumption-Related Behavior

TLDR
This paper compares the influence on consumption behaviors of emotional pictures and valence-matched words presented at suboptimal and supraliminal durations and discusses these findings in light of privileged access theories, which hold that pictures better convey affective meaning than words, and embodiment theories, who hold that images better elicit somatosensory and motor responses.

Bob Zajonc and the Unconscious Emotion

This article focuses on Bob Zajonc’s views on unconscious emotion, especially in the context of the debates about the independence of affect and cognition. Historically, Bob was always interested in

Extraversion and reward-related processing: probing incentive motivation in affective priming tasks.

TLDR
The results bridge an important gap in the literature between biological and trait models of incentive motivation and do so in a way that should be informative to subsequent efforts to understand the processing basis of extraversion as well as incentive motivation.

Anxiety and Decision-Making

An examination of cognition and affect in strategic decision‐making

Purpose – The purpose of this article is to better understand the nature of the decision maker's cognitive‐affective information processing behavior in the context of strategic decision

Embodied Perspective on Emotion-Cognition Interactions

Emotions permeate social and non-social cognition. However, our understanding of the underlying mechanisms remains elusive. One reason is because traditional amodal or symbolic accounts of cognition
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 139 REFERENCES

Mood and judgment: the affect infusion model (AIM).

  • J. Forgas
  • Psychology
    Psychological bulletin
  • 1995
TLDR
A new integrative theory, the affect infusion model (AIM), is proposed as a comprehensive explanation of these effects of affective states in social judgments, and predicts that judgments requiring heuristic or substantive processing are more likely to be infused by affect than are direct access or motivated judgments.

Subliminal affective priming resists attributional interventions.

We examine two explanations of the subliminal affective priming effect. The feelings-as-information model (Schwarz & Clore, 1988) holds that judgements are based on perceptible feelings. Hence,

All Negative Moods Are Not Equal: Motivational Influences of Anxiety and Sadness on Decision Making.

  • RaghunathanPham
  • Psychology
    Organizational behavior and human decision processes
  • 1999
TLDR
Results from three experiments show that, in gambling decisions, as well as in job-selection decisions, sad individuals are biased in favor of high-risk/high-reward options, whereas anxious individuals are bias in Favor of low- risk/low-reWARD options.

How Emotion Shapes Behavior: Feedback, Anticipation, and Reflection, Rather Than Direct Causation

TLDR
The authors develop a theory of emotion as a feedback system whose influence on behavior is typically indirect, and justify replacing the direct causation model with the feedback model to justify replacing a large body of empirical findings.

Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures.

TLDR
The affective primacy hypothesis, which asserts that positive and negative affective reactions can be evoked with minimal stimulus input and virtually no cognitive processing, is tested by comparing the effects of affective and cognitive priming under extremely brief and longer exposure durations.

Unconscious Emotion

TLDR
Evidence that positive and negative reactions can be elicited subliminally and remain inaccessible to introspection is described, suggesting that processes underlying conscious feelings can become decoupled from processes underlying emotional reactions, resulting in genuinely unconscious emotion.

Behavioral Consequences of Affect: Combining Evaluative and Regulatory Mechanisms

The proposed model integrates two streams of research on affect by specifying how evaluative and regulatory mechanisms interact to guide behavior. Two experiments demonstrate that when no

Unconscious Affective Reactions to Masked Happy Versus Angry Faces Influence Consumption Behavior and Judgments of Value

TLDR
The results suggest that basic affective reactions can be unconscious and interact with incentive motivation to influence assessment of value and behavior toward valenced objects.

Fear, anger, and risk.

TLDR
The present studies highlight multiple benefits of studying specific emotions as a complement to studies that link affective valence to judgment outcomes, and predict that fear and anger have opposite effects on risk perception.

The emotion probe. Studies of motivation and attention.

  • P. Lang
  • Psychology, Biology
    The American psychologist
  • 1995
TLDR
Using a large emotional picture library, reliable affective psychophysiologies are shown, defined by the judged valence (appetitive/pleasant or aversive/unpleasant) and arousal of picture percepts.
...