Affect, Not Ideology A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization

@article{Iyengar2012AffectNI,
  title={Affect, Not Ideology A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization},
  author={Shanto Iyengar and Gaurav Sood and Yphtach Lelkes},
  journal={Public Opinion Quarterly},
  year={2012},
  volume={76},
  pages={405-431}
}
The current debate over the extent of polarization in the American mass public focuses on the extent to which partisans’ policy preferences have moved. Whereas "maximalists" claim that partisans’ views on policies have become more extreme over time (Abramowitz 2010), "minimalists" (Fiorina and Abrams 2009) contend that the majority of Americans remain centrist, and that what little centrifugal movement has occurred reflects sorting, i.e., the increased association between partisanship and… 

Through the ideology of the beholder: how ideology shapes perceptions of partisan groups

Growing attitudinal and affective differences across party lines and increasing social polarization are often attributed to the strengthening of partisanship as a social identity. Scholars have

“ Through the Ideology of the Beholder : Partisan Perceptions and Polarization Among the Mass Public

Recent scholarship uses insight from social identity theory to conceptualize partisanship as a group identity rooted in partisan images, but devotes less attention to understanding the causes and

The Great and Widening Divide: Political False Polarization and its Consequences

American politics is becoming increasingly ideologically divided, and this cross-party hostility is reflected in pronounced partisan media outrage. However, while actual ideological polarization has

“I Disrespectfully Agree”: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization

Disagreements over whether polarization exists in the mass public have confounded two separate types of polarization. When social polarization is separated from issue position polarization, both

The Polarizing Effects of Online Partisan Criticism: Evidence from Two Experiments

Affective and social political polarization—a dislike of political opponents and a desire to avoid their company—are increasingly salient and pervasive features of politics in many Western

Deliberate with the Enemy? Polarization, Social Identity, and Attitudes toward Disagreement

As of late, political theory, research, and practice have taken a deliberative turn, extolling the benefits of idealized public discourse. This paper explores how mass polarization impacts the

The Polarizing Effects of Partisan Sorting

Partisan-ideological identity sorting is capable of driving mass political behavior. As recent work in social psychology demonstrates, social identities such as party and ideology are powerful

Ideologues without Issues: The Polarizing Consequences of Ideological Identities

The distinction between a person’s ideological identity and their issue positions has come more clearly into focus in recent research. Scholars have pointed out a significant difference between

What Kind of Identity is Partisan Identity? “Social” versus “Political” Partisanship in Divided Democracies

Many scholars blame partisan polarization for collapsing politics into social life. But these diagnoses lack any sophisticated theoretical basis for distinguishing “social” from “political” forms of

The Group Theory of Parties: Identity Politics, Party Stereotypes, and Polarization in the 21st Century

Abstract An emerging narrative contends that 2016 was significant for bridging identity politics and American party conflict. This narrative misses a fundamental truth: for ordinary Americans,
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 82 REFERENCES

Putting Polarization in Perspective

Scholarly research has demonstrated rather conclusively that American political elites have undergone a marked partisan polarization over the past thirty years. There is less agreement, however, as

Is Polarization a Myth?

This article uses data from the American National Election Studies and national exit polls to test Fiorina's assertion that ideological polarization in the American public is a myth. Fiorina argues

More than Ideology: Conservative–Liberal Identity and Receptivity to Political Cues

To many commentators and social scientists, Americans’ stances on political issues are to an important extent driven by an underlying conservative–liberal ideological dimension. Self-identification

Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches

The idea of America as politically polarized—that there is an unbridgeable divide between right and left, red and blue states—has become a cliche. What commentators miss, however, is that increasing

Partisan Media Exposure and Attitudes Toward the Opposition

How has the rise of partisan media outlets changed how citizens perceive the other party? In particular, does watching partisan news sources make citizens dislike and distrust the other party?

Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization

For the most part, scholars who study American political parties in the electorate continue to characterize them as weak and in decline. Parties on the elite level, however, have experienced a

Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters

In this authoritative study, three political scientists demonstrate that identification with political parties powerfully determines how citizens look at politics and cast their ballots. "Partisan

Diverging Parties: Social Change, Realignment, and Party Polarization

Party polarization in the House of Representatives has increased in recent decades. Explaining this development has been difficult, given current interpretations of American elections. The dominant

The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy

Renowned political scientist Alan I. Abramowitz presents a groundbreaking argument that the most important divide in American politics is not between left and right but rather between citizens who
...