Aerobic fitness and response variability in preadolescent children performing a cognitive control task.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To investigate the relationship between aerobic fitness and cognitive variability in preadolescent children. METHOD Forty-eight preadolescent children (25 males, 23 females, mean age = 10.1 years) were grouped into higher- and lower-fit groups according to their performance on a test of aerobic capacity (VO2max). Cognitive function was measured via behavioral responses to a modified flanker task. The distribution in reaction time was calculated within each participant to assess intraindividual variability of performance. Specifically, the standard deviation and coefficient variation of reaction time were used to represent cognitive variability. RESULTS Preadolescent children, regardless of fitness, exhibited longer reaction time, increased response variability, and decreased response accuracy to incongruent compared to congruent trials. Further, higher-fit children were less variable in their response time and more accurate in their responses across conditions of the flanker task, while no group differences were observed for response speed. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that fitness is associated with better cognitive performance during a task that varies cognitive control demands, and extends this area of research to suggest that intraindividual variability may be a useful measure to examine the relationship between fitness and cognition during preadolescence.

DOI: 10.1037/a0022167

Extracted Key Phrases

3 Figures and Tables

0501002011201220132014201520162017
Citations per Year

210 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 210 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Wu2011AerobicFA, title={Aerobic fitness and response variability in preadolescent children performing a cognitive control task.}, author={Chien-Ting Wu and Matthew B. Pontifex and Lauren B. Raine and Laura Chaddock and Michelle W. Voss and Arthur F. Kramer and Charles H. Hillman}, journal={Neuropsychology}, year={2011}, volume={25 3}, pages={333-41} }