Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making

@inproceedings{Lau2001AdvantagesAD,
  title={Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making},
  author={Richard R. Lau and David P. Redlawsk},
  year={2001}
}
This article challenges the often un- tested assumption that cognitive "heuristics" improve the decision- making abilities of everyday voters. The potential benefits and costs of five common political heuristics are discussed. A new dynamic process- tracing methodology is employed to directly observe the use of these five heuristics by voters in a mock presi- dential election campaign. We find that cognitive heuristics are at times employed by almost all voters and that they are particularly… CONTINUE READING

Figures and Tables from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 163 CITATIONS

Information, accountability, and political preferences

VIEW 7 EXCERPTS
CITES BACKGROUND & RESULTS
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

FILTER CITATIONS BY YEAR

2003
2019

CITATION STATISTICS

  • 16 Highly Influenced Citations

  • Averaged 13 Citations per year from 2017 through 2019

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 59 REFERENCES

" The Effect of Dynamic and Static Choice Sets on Political Decision Making : An Analysis Using the Decision Board Platform

Guillermo Owen, Nehemia Geva, Steven B. Redd, Amy Carnes
  • American Political Science Review
  • 1997

" Age Differences in Political Decision Making : Strategies for Evaluating Political Candidates

Riggle, B. EllenD., Mitzi M. S. Johnson
  • Political Behavior
  • 1996

" Information Search During an Election Campaign : Introducing a Process Tracing Methodology to Political Science . " In

R Richard
  • Searchable Information During an Election Campaign
  • 1995