Advantages and Disadvantages of Co-Therapy

  title={Advantages and Disadvantages of Co-Therapy},
  author={Eugenija Cividini-Strani and Eduard Klain},
  journal={Group Analysis},
  pages={156 - 159}
EVER since co-therapy was introduced, the advantages and disadvantages of this method have been debated. Napolitani (1979, 1980) sums up the situation as follows: As far as group therapy conduct is concerned, co-therapy not only fails to offer significant advantages, but is in fact not quite free of a certain amount of risk (the frequency of interpersonal complications between therapists is well known). However, there are two situations in group therapy work in which co-therapy may be indicated… 

Co-therapy in a Group Setting: Benefits and Challenges in Facilitating Co-Therapy Music Therapy in a Small Group Setting

The study uses examples of co-therapy with small groups of clients with a range of different needs, to provide a wide picture of how co-Therapy could be used effectively in music therapy, but also to discuss the issues that occurred when co-facilitating.

Cotherapy and `Re-Parenting' in a Group for Disturbed Children

This paper focuses on the experience of conducting an analytic group for severely disturbed children between the ages of 7 and 11 years, and explores the issues arising for cotherapists in this



Co-Therapy By Alternate Conduction and Reciprocal Supervision

concerning the conducting of ordinary group-analytic groups most Authors believe and we agree that co-therapy does not offer relevant therapeutic benefits and is not riskless (the frequency of

Group-Analytic Psychotherapy

London: Interface. NAPOLITANI, F. (1979) CeTherapy by Alternate Conduction and Reciprocal Supervision

  • 1975

Report on Dr and Mrs Skynner's Seminar

  • 1973

Training in Group Analysis. Quadrangolo

  • 1980