Activity Theory Is a Dead End for Cultural-Historical Psychology
@article{Toomela2000ActivityTI,
title={Activity Theory Is a Dead End for Cultural-Historical Psychology},
author={A. Toomela},
journal={Culture & Psychology},
year={2000},
volume={6},
pages={353 - 364}
}In this article, activity theory is analysed. Specific examples for the analysis are taken from Ratner’s (2000) article on emotions. It is concluded that activity theory in general and Ratner’s approach in particular are deficient at three different levels of analysis: from a general theoretical approach to the study of mind to specific details of how particular mental phenomena and their development are studied. Reasons are proposed for why activity theory in principle cannot solve those… CONTINUE READING
46 Citations
Commentary: Activity Theory is a Dead End for Methodological Thinking in Cultural Psychology Too
- Sociology
- 2008
30
Activity Theories and the Ontology of Psychology: Learning from Danish and Russian Experiences
- Medicine, Sociology
- 2015
30
Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory: The Future of Activity Theory: A Rough Draft
- Psychology
- 2009
252
References
Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 38 REFERENCES
Myshlenije i rech. Moscow: Labirint
- 1934