Activity Theory Is a Dead End for Cultural-Historical Psychology

@article{Toomela2000ActivityTI,
  title={Activity Theory Is a Dead End for Cultural-Historical Psychology},
  author={A. Toomela},
  journal={Culture & Psychology},
  year={2000},
  volume={6},
  pages={353 - 364}
}
  • A. Toomela
  • Published 2000
  • Psychology
  • Culture & Psychology
  • In this article, activity theory is analysed. Specific examples for the analysis are taken from Ratner’s (2000) article on emotions. It is concluded that activity theory in general and Ratner’s approach in particular are deficient at three different levels of analysis: from a general theoretical approach to the study of mind to specific details of how particular mental phenomena and their development are studied. Reasons are proposed for why activity theory in principle cannot solve those… CONTINUE READING
    Concerning Interpretations of Activity Theory
    • 15
    Theory and practice
    The First Six Years: Culture’s Adventures in Psychology
    • 49
    Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory: The Future of Activity Theory: A Rough Draft
    • 256
    • Open Access
    What are Higher Psychological Functions?
    • 20
    The Internalization Theory of Emotions: A Cultural Historical Approach to the Development of Emotions
    • 44
    • Open Access

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 38 REFERENCES
    A Cultural-Psychological Analysis of Emotions
    • 156
    Analyzing Emotions as Culturally Constructed Scripts
    • 34
    How Culture Transforms Mind: A Process of Internalization
    • 44
    Cultural psychology: a once and future discipline?
    • 3,404
    • Open Access
    Understanding Vygotsky: A Quest for Synthesis
    • 692
    Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology
    • 580
    • Open Access
    The Principles of Psychology
    • 6,545
    • Open Access
    The Vygotsky Reader
    • 414
    Principles of Gestalt Psychology.
    • 4,344
    • Open Access