Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities

Abstract

Active, constructive, and interactive are terms that are commonly used in the cognitive and learning sciences. They describe activities that can be undertaken by learners. However, the literature is actually not explicit about how these terms can be defined; whether they are distinct; and whether they refer to overt manifestations, learning processes, or learning outcomes. Thus, a framework is provided here that offers a way to differentiate active, constructive, and interactive in terms of observable overt activities and underlying learning processes. The framework generates a testable hypothesis for learning: that interactive activities are most likely to be better than constructive activities, which in turn might be better than active activities, which are better than being passive. Studies from the literature are cited to provide evidence in support of this hypothesis. Moreover, postulating underlying learning processes allows us to interpret evidence in the literature more accurately. Specifying distinct overt activities for active, constructive, and interactive also offers suggestions for how learning activities can be coded and how each kind of activity might be elicited.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x

Extracted Key Phrases

5 Figures and Tables

Showing 1-10 of 85 references

Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and notetaking-review as strategies for learning from lectures

  • A King
  • 1992
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

Peer interaction and problem solving: When are two heads better than one? Child Development

  • M Azmitia
  • 1988
Highly Influential
3 Excerpts

Topics in Cognitive Science

  • M T H Chi
  • 2009

Teaching chemical equilibrium with the jigsaw technique

  • K Doymus
  • 2008
2 Excerpts
Showing 1-10 of 101 extracted citations
02040200920102011201220132014201520162017
Citations per Year

180 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has received between 128 and 255 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.