Accuracy of Deception Judgments

@article{Bond2006AccuracyOD,
  title={Accuracy of Deception Judgments},
  author={C. F. Bond and B. Depaulo},
  journal={Personality and Social Psychology Review},
  year={2006},
  volume={10},
  pages={214 - 234}
}
We analyze the accuracy of deception judgments, synthesizing research results from 206 documents and 24,483 judges. In relevant studies, people attempt to discriminate lies from truths in real time with no special aids or training. In these circumstances, people achieve an average of 54% correct lie-truth judgments, correctly classifying 47% of lies as deceptive and 61% of truths as nondeceptive. Relative to cross-judge differences in accuracy, mean lie-truth discrimination abilities are… Expand

Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper

Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.
TLDR
A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception, confining attention to occasions when people judge strangers' veracity in real-time with no special aids, reveals that the outcome of a deception judgment depends more on the liar's credibility than any other individual difference. Expand
Heuristic versus Systematic Processing of Information in Detecting Deception: Questioning the Truth Bias
TLDR
An experiment was conducted in which participants who were taking a psychology and law course were requested to make judgments of credibility at different points of the senders' statements, suggesting that when exposed to brief communications, the observers make heuristic judgments. Expand
Observers' decision moment in deception detection experiments: Its impact on judgment, accuracy, and confidence
Research into the nonverbal detection of deception has typically been conducted by asking observers to judge whether a number of videotaped statements are truthful or deceptive. In most cases, theExpand
Deception Detection Process and Accuracy: An Examination of How U.S. Military Officers Detect Deception in the Workplace
Abstract : Research shows that humans are, on average, only slightly better-than-chance at deception detection. Meta-analysis conducted by Charles Bond and Bella DePaulo in their work Accuracy ofExpand
Producing deception detection
Purpose – To function effectively, police must separate lies from truth. Police, ideally, would be experts at this task, yet there is debate surrounding whether expertise in detecting deception isExpand
The effects of truth–lie base-rates on deception detection accuracy in Korea
ABSTRACT Two experiments provided the first tests of the Park-Levine Probability Model in an intercultural context. The Park-Levine Model predicts a linear relationship between truth–lie base-ratesExpand
Assessing Deception Detection Accuracy with Dichotomous Truth–Lie Judgments and Continuous Scaling: Are People Really More Accurate When Honesty Is Scaled?
Deception detection experiments consistently find that people are only slightly better than chance at distinguishing truths from lies. Interpersonal deception theory research, however, claims thatExpand
The effect of statement type and repetition on deception detection
TLDR
The results show that repeated statements as well as shorter denials can increase the difficulty of differentiating truthful from deceptive statements, and suggest that truthful statements also benefit from repetition with regard to enhancing their believability. Expand
Ecological Validity and Deception Detection Research Design
ABSTRACT The concept of ecological validity is explicated and applied to deception detection research. The ecology of the deception lab typically involves researchers randomly assigning andExpand
Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.
TLDR
The results suggest that intuitive notions about deception are more accurate than explicit knowledge and that lie detection is more readily improved by increasing behavioral differences between liars and truth tellers than by informing lie-catchers of valid cues to deception. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 91 REFERENCES
The Fundamental Attribution Error in Detecting Deception: The Boy-Who-Cried-Wolf Effect
TLDR
Evidence is offered from two experiments that the fundamental attribution error significantly undermines the ability to detect honesty and deception accurately, leading, as predicted, to positive correlations with honest detection accuracy and negative correlations with deception detection accuracy. Expand
Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: Documenting the “veracity effect”
Deception research has consistently shown that accuracy rates tend to be just over fifty percent when accuracy rates are averaged across truthful and deceptive messages and when an equal number ofExpand
The Kernel of Truth in Judgments of Deceptiveness
We investigated the relation between appearance-based impressions of honesty and individuals' willingness to engage in deceptive behaviors. The data reveal that people who were thought to lookExpand
How people really detect lies
A primary focus of research in the area of deceptive communication has been on people's ability to detect deception. The premise of the current paper is that participants in previous deceptionExpand
Cues to deception.
TLDR
Results show that in some ways, liars are less forthcoming than truth tellers, and they tell less compelling tales, and their stories include fewer ordinary imperfections and unusual contents. Expand
Interpersonal Deception
Interpersonal Deception Theory (IDT) posits that socially skilled individuals are better able to project truthful demeanors and evade detection than are unskilled individuals. IDT also predicts thatExpand
Verbal and Nonverbal Communication of Deception1
Publisher Summary Lying and lie detection are the two components that, together, make up the exchange called as the “communication of deception.” Deception is an act that is intended to foster inExpand
Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation: the case of a convicted murderer
All deception studies published to date have been laboratory studies. In such studies people lied only for the sake of the experiment, consequently the stakes were usually low. Although research hasExpand
Behavioral Cues to Deception vs. Topic Incriminating Potential in Criminal Confessions
TLDR
The results supported hypothesis about differentiating deception cues from incriminating potential cues in high-stakes interviews, and suggested that extensive research on distinctions between stress-related cues and cues to deception would improve deception detection. Expand
The relative effects of timing of suspicion and outcome involvement on biased message processing
The propensity to believe information to be predominately truthful has been called the truth-bias (e.g., McCornack & Levine, 1990), although the lie-bias is the tendency to believe that informationExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...