Accuracy, Precision, And Agreement Statistical Tests For Bland-Altman Method

@inproceedings{Silveira2021AccuracyPA,
  title={Accuracy, Precision, And Agreement Statistical Tests For Bland-Altman Method},
  author={Paulo S. P. Silveira and Jo{\~a}o E. Vieira and Antonio Ferraro and Jos{\'e} de Oliveira Siqueira},
  year={2021}
}
Background: Bland and Altman plot method is a widely cited graphical approach to assess equivalence of quantitative measurement techniques. Perhaps due to its graphical output, it has been widely applied, however often misinterpreted by lacking of inferential statistical support. To compare data sets obtained from two measurement techniques, researchers may apply Pearson’s correlation, ordinal least-square linear regression, or the Bland-Altman plot methods, failing to locate the weakness of… 
View PDF on arXiv

Figures from this paper

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 50 REFERENCES
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
The power of a paired t-test with a covariate.
Method agreement analysis: a review of correct methodology.
Measuring agreement in method comparison studies
TLDR
The 95% limits of agreement, estimated by mean difference 1.96 standard deviation of the differences, provide an interval within which 95% of differences between measurements by the two methods are expected to lie.
R package: eirasBA
  • 2021
package: eirasBA; 2021
  • Available from: http://github.com/pspsilveira/eiras_paperBA
  • 2021
A new statistical methodology overcame the defects of the Bland & Altman method.
On Jones et al.’s method for extending Bland-Altman plots to limits of agreement with the mean for multiple observers
TLDR
The proposed LOAM and the associated confidence intervals are useful for assessing agreement between continuous measurements and are extended to the case of multiple measurements per observer.
Using multiple agreement methods for continuous repeated measures data: a tutorial for practitioners
TLDR
A tutorial to help guide practitioners when choosing among different methods of assessing agreement based on a linear mixed model assumption and suggests that researchers consider using the coverage probability method alongside a graphical display of the raw data in method comparison studies.
Assessing bias, precision, and agreement in method comparison studies
  • P. Taffé
  • Economics
    Statistical methods in medical research
  • 2019
TLDR
The goal in this paper is to extend this methodology in several important directions by developing simultaneous confidence bands for the various parameters estimated to allow formal comparisons between different measurement methods.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...