Accountability in algorithmic decision making

  title={Accountability in algorithmic decision making},
  author={Nicholas A. Diakopoulos},
  journal={Communications of the ACM},
  pages={56 - 62}
A view from computational journalism. 

Topics from this paper

Understanding How People Interact with Algorithm-based Systems Using Artificial Intelligence
Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason
Drawing from political philosophy, it is argued that situating demands for algorithmic accountability within this justificatory framework enables us to better articulate their purpose and assess the adequacy of efforts toward them. Expand
From Context Mediation to Declarative Values and Explainability
We argue that there are fruitful (inter)relations between value alignment of AI systems, trust in humans-AI interaction, and declarative representations that make AI systems transparent andExpand
Artificial Intelligence and Transparency: Opening the Black Box
The alleged opacity of AI has become a major political issue over the past few years. Opening the black box, so it is argued, is indispensable to identify encroachments on user privacy, to detectExpand
A Model for Evaluating Algorithmic Systems Accountability
A model for evaluating how transparent algorithms are by focusing on their algorithmic part as well as the maturity of the organizations that utilize them was applied on a classification algorithm created and utilized by a large financial institution. Expand
Towards algorithmic Experience : Redesigning Facebook’s News Feed
Algorithms currently have direct implications in our democracies and societies, but they also define mostly all our daily activities as users, defining our decisions and promoting different behavioExpand
"A cold, technical decision-maker": Can AI provide explainability, negotiability, and humanity?
A qualitative study of algorithmic decision-making is presented, comprised of five workshops conducted with a total of 60 participants in Finland, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States, which viewed AI as a decision-maker that follows rigid criteria and performs mechanical tasks well, but is largely incapable of subjective or morally complex judgments. Expand
From Algorithmic Black Boxes to Adaptive White Boxes: Declarative Decision-Theoretic Ethical Programs as Codes of Ethics
This paper argues for looking at how humans have formalized and communicated values, in professional codes of ethics, and for exploring declarative decision-theoretic ethical programs (DDTEP) to formalize codes of Ethics. Expand
Beyond Transparency: Exploring Algorithmic Accountability
This dissertation explores the role of algorithmic tranparency, algorithmic literacy and related issues as approaches towards holding algorithmic systems more accountable and aims to provide both theoretical insights and material solutions to the problem of accountability. Expand
Sociotechnical Systems and Ethics in the Large
The conception of ethical STS founded on governance that takes into account stakeholder values, normative constraints on agents, and outcomes (states of the STS) that obtain due to actions taken by agents is presented. Expand


Accountability in a computerized society
This essay warns of eroding accountability in computerized societies. It argues that assumptions about computing and features of situations in which computers are produced create barriers toExpand
Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact
This work links disparate impact to a measure of classification accuracy that while known, has received relatively little attention and proposes a test for disparate impact based on how well the protected class can be predicted from the other attributes. Expand
Systematic Bias and Nontransparency in US Social Security Administration Forecasts
We offer an evaluation of the Social Security Administration demographic and financial forecasts used to assess the long-term solvency of the Social Security Trust Funds. This same forecastingExpand
Is there an ethics of algorithms?
We argue that some algorithms are value-laden, and that two or more persons who accept different value-judgments may have a rational reason to design such algorithms differently. We exemplify ourExpand
Data-Driven Rankings : The Design and Development of the IEEE Top Programming Languages News App
In this paper we explore the design and development of a datadriven app that ranks programming languages. We detail the design rationale and editorial decisions that constitute the app, includingExpand
The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections
It is shown that biased search rankings can shift the voting preferences of undecided voters by 20% or more, the shift can be much higher in some demographic groups, and such rankings can be masked so that people show no awareness of the manipulation. Expand
[89WashLRev0001] The Scored Society: Due Process for Automated Predictions
P Procedural regularity is essential for those stigmatized by “artificially intelligent” scoring systems, and regulators should be able to test scoring systems to ensure their fairness and accuracy. Expand
Turkers, Scholars, "Arafat" and "Peace": Cultural Communities and Algorithmic Gold Standards
It is shown that crowdworkers on Mechanical Turk produce significantly different semantic relatedness gold standard judgements than people from other communities, which problematize the notion that a universal gold standard dataset exists for all knowledge tasks. Expand
Getting the Message?: A Study of Explanation Interfaces for Microblog Data Analysis
A study of three interface variations of a tool for analyzing commuter traffic anomalies in the San Francisco Bay Area supports novel interaction between a prediction algorithm and a human analyst, and is designed to explore the boundaries, limitations and synergies of both. Expand
Enter the Robot Journalist
The advent of new technologies has always spurred questions about changes in journalism—its content, its means of production, and its consumption. A quite recent development in the realm of digitalExpand