Accountability Systems: Implications of Requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001

  title={Accountability Systems: Implications of Requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001},
  author={Robert L. Linn and Eva L. Baker and Damian W. Betebenner},
  journal={Educational Researcher},
  pages={16 - 3}
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 substantially increases the testing requirements for states and sets demanding accountability standards for schools, districts, and states with measurable adequate yearly progress (AYP) objectives for all students and subgroups of students defined by socioeconomic background, race–ethnicity, English language proficiency, and disability. However, states’ content standards, the rigor of their tests, and the stringency of their performance standards vary… Expand

Figures and Tables from this paper

Analyzing the Minority Gap in Achievement Scores: Issues for States and Federal Government
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 requires that states demonstrate a reduction in the test score minority gap over time but does not specify what methodology states must use to demonstrate this.Expand
No child, no school, no state left behind: schooling in the age of accountability 1
Why and under which conditions do international student assessment programmes like PISA have success? How can the results of these assessments be useful for advocates of different, evenExpand
Do National and State Assessments Converge for Educational Accountability? A Meta-Analytic Synthesis of Multiple Measures in Maine and Kentucky
Given the policy imperative of using multiple measures for state education accountability under the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), this study examines similarities and discrepancies between theExpand
Accountability: Responsibility and Reasonable Expectations
Some of the central features of current educational accountability systems are discussed using the requirements under the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 as the primary example. It is arguedExpand
The Initial Response to the Accountability Requirements in the No Child Left Behind Act: A Case Study of Virginia and Georgia.
This study had two broad goals: to discuss state politics and accountability policies in Virginia and Georgia before the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act and to analyze the civil rights implicationsExpand
A Primer on Student Growth Percentiles
Summary Following the 2001 reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, commonly known as the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), states were required to implement large scaleExpand
Examining the Assumptions Underlying the NCLB Federal Accountability Policy on School Improvement
Many wonder whether the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) will realize its goal of improving achievement among low-performing students in high-poverty schools. An examination of assumptionsExpand
The Waive of the Future? School Accountability in the Waiver Era
Forty-two states and the District of Columbia have recently received waivers to the school accountability requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). As the prospects for reauthorizing theExpand
Understanding Public School Accountability Report Design
From the passing of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) through to the signing of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), all states receiving federal funds must have been required to publicly report on theExpand
Accountability and Student Mobility under Title I of the No Child Left Behind Act.
Mobile students face three related risks in the implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act. First, in determining schools' academic progress, some mobile students may not be academically assessedExpand


Assessments and Accountability
Use of tests and assessments as key elements in five waves of educational reform during the past 50 years are reviewed. These waves include the role of tests in tracking and selection emphasized inExpand
Volatility in School Test Scores: Implications for Test-Based Accountability Systems
B y the spring of 2000, forty states had begun using student test scores to rate school performance. Twenty states have gone a step further and are attaching explicit monetary rewards or sanctions toExpand
Stability of School-Building Accountability Scores and Gains
A number of states have school-building accountability systems that rely on comparisons of achievement from one year to the next. Improvement of the performance of schools is judged by changes in theExpand
Raising the Stakes of Test Administration: The Impact on Student Performance on the National Assessment of Educational Progress.
This article briefly reviews the current discussion of the effects of test administration conditions (i.e., testing stakes), and the motivational levels associated with them, on achievement testExpand
Effects of Motivational Interventions on the National Assessment of Educational Progress Mathematics Performance
One of the reasons often cited h r the low average level of proficiency demonstrated by U.S. students on national and international assessments is that there are no consequences or stakes attached toExpand
Performance Assessment: Policy Promises and Technical Measurement Standards
Major changes in the nature and context of assessment are underway that have potential implications for technical measurement standards. Three particularly notable changes are (a) the expanded roleExpand
Uncommon Measures: Equivalence and Linkage among Educational Tests.
A study was conducted of the feasibility of establishing an equivalency scale that would enable commercial state tests to be linked to one another and to the National Assessment of EducationalExpand
No Child Left Behind What
Ranking as one of the most frequent educational news items in the public press, on the Web, and in professional journals (see sidebar), the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLBA) has truly capturedExpand
Generalizability Analysis for Performance Assessments of Student Achievement or School Effectiveness
Evidence of the uncertainty attached to school and individual scores is required to avoid over interpretation of results. Generalizability analysis provides in the standard error a suitable indicatorExpand
High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning
A brief history of high-stakes testing is followed by an analysis of eighteen states with severe consequences attached to their testing programs. These 18 states were examined to see if theirExpand