Acceptance of Self-driving Cars

@article{Nees2016AcceptanceOS,
  title={Acceptance of Self-driving Cars},
  author={Michael A. Nees},
  journal={Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting},
  year={2016},
  volume={60},
  pages={1449 - 1453}
}
  • M. Nees
  • Published 1 September 2016
  • Psychology
  • Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Despite enthusiastic speculation about the potential benefits of self-driving cars, to date little is known about the factors that will affect drivers’ acceptance or rejection of this emerging technology. Gaining acceptance from end users will be critical to the widespread deployment of self-driving vehicles. Long-term acceptance may be harmed if initial acceptance is built upon unrealistic expectations developed before people interact with these systems. A brief (24-item) measurement scale was… 

Tables from this paper

The role of utilitarianism, self-safety, and technology in the acceptance of self-driving cars
TLDR
The empirical outcome of this work shows that the three investigated factors contribute to the societal acceptance of self-driving cars, with technology being the major contributor while the ethical aspects (self-safety and utilitarianism) follow.
The effects of trait anxiety and the big five personality traits on self-driving car acceptance
Self-driving cars are expected to be integrated into the traffic system in the near future. It is crucial to understand how the public accepts self-driving cars and how adoption rates are influenced.
Self-Driving Car Acceptance and the Role of Ethics
  • S. Karnouskos
  • Computer Science, Sociology
    IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
  • 2020
TLDR
This quantitative positivist research investigates the link of selected ethical frameworks, i.e., utilitarianism, deontology, relativism, absolutism (monism), and pluralism, to the acceptance of self-driving cars.
What drives the acceptance of autonomous driving? An investigation of acceptance factors from an end-user's perspective
TLDR
How social influence, system characteristics, and individual factors determine individual acceptance of autonomous driving is revealed, with implications for practitioners.
How the older population perceives self-driving vehicles
Abstract Self-driving vehicles (SAE Level 5) are driven by automated vehicle technology and without any human driver input. These vehicles will especially be helpful to people who cannot drive,
Safer than the average human driver (who is less safe than me)? Examining a popular safety benchmark for self-driving cars.
  • M. Nees
  • Medicine, Computer Science
    Journal of safety research
  • 2019
TLDR
This study replicated the better-than average effect and showed that most drivers stated a desire for self-driving cars that are safer than their own perceived ability to drive safely before they would: (1) feel reasonably safe riding in aSelf-driving vehicle; (2) buy a self- Driving vehicle, all other things being equal; and (3) allow self- driving vehicles on public roads.
Drivers' Interaction with, and Perception Toward Semi-autonomous Vehicles in Naturalistic Settings
TLDR
Findings show what should be considered to improve driver-autonomous vehicle interaction, in turn to help reduce workload, enhance usability, and acceptance.
Investigating end-user acceptance of autonomous electric buses to accelerate diffusion
TLDR
This research supplements the existing corpora by demonstrating the importance of individual acceptance and incorporating it to derive policy implications, and indicates that a mix of individual factors, social impacts, and system characteristics determine an individual's acceptance of AEBs.
Learning the “Language” of Road Users - How Shall a Self-driving Car Convey Its Intention to Cooperate to Other Human Drivers?
Communication between road users is ruled by road traffic regulations, but there are also implicit laws of communication. Especially lane changes in dense traffic scenarios require not only
Don't Drive Me My Way: Subjective Perception of Autonomous Braking Trajectories for Pedestrian Crossings
TLDR
Investigation of the effect of different braking trajectories of a fully autonomous vehicle (SAE Level 5) approaching a zebra crossing shows significant differences between the approaches in terms of how critical and cooperative they were perceived.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 27 REFERENCES
Intention to use a fully automated car: attitudes and a priori acceptability
If previous research studied acceptability of partially or highly automated driving, few of them focused on fully automated driving (FAD), including the ability to master longitudinal control,
Augmenting the Technology Acceptance Model with Trust: Commercial Drivers’ Attitudes towards Monitoring and Feedback
This study evaluates truck drivers’ attitudes toward an on-board monitoring system (OBMS), using an extended version of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) that accounts for drivers’ trust in OBMS.
Setting the stage for autonomous cars: a pilot study of future autonomous driving experiences
Autonomous cars are undergoing rapid development. In order to gain acceptance and adoption, there is a need to understand how users will respond to the technology, and what possible benefits or
Road safety with self-driving vehicles: general limitations and road sharing with conventional vehicles
Self-driving vehicles are expected to improve road safety, improve the mobility of those who currently cannot use conventional vehicles, and reduce emissions. In this white paper the authors discuss
Public opinion on automated driving: results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents
This study investigated user acceptance, worries, and willingness to buy partially, highly, and fully automated vehicles. By means of a 63-question Internet-based survey, we collected 5,000 responses
POINT OF VIEW: Who Is in Charge? The Promises and Pitfalls of Driverless Cars
Driverless car technology promises safer and more efficient driving systems, but many questions remain. This article discusses some of the issues that need consideration before driverless car
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Computer systems cannot improve organizational performance if they aren't used. Unfortunately, resistance to end-user systems by managers and professionals is a widespread problem. To better predict,
The evolution of mental model, trust and acceptance of adaptive cruise control in relation to initial information
Abstract Adaptive cruise control (ACC) automates vehicle speed and distance control. Due to sensor limitations, not every situation can be handled by the system and, therefore, driver intervention is
Acceptance of Automated Road Transport Systems (ARTS): An adaptation of the UTAUT model
As research into innovative forms of automated transportation systems gains momentum, it is important that we develop an understanding of the factors that will impact the adoption of these systems.
Preface to the Special Section on Human Factors and Automation in Vehicles
TLDR
Diverse research regarding driver interaction with advanced automotive technology to guide design of increasingly automated vehicles suggests that the automate philosophy can delay driver responses to incidents in which the driver has to intervene and take control from the automation.
...
1
2
3
...