Academic Evaluation in Higher Education

  title={Academic Evaluation in Higher Education},
  author={Julian Hamann and Stefan Beljean},
  journal={The International Encyclopedia of Higher Education Systems and Institutions},
  • Julian Hamann, Stefan Beljean
  • Published 29 September 2019
  • Education
  • The International Encyclopedia of Higher Education Systems and Institutions
The world of academia is permeated with evaluations. Academic processes of evaluation play a central role in both the production and reception of scholarly work as well as for the status of academic entities like scholars, departments, or universities. This contribution provides an overview over the literature on academic evaluation, with particular focus on the variety of evaluative practices and arenas, different analytical perspectives on academic evaluation, disciplinary differences in… 
Evaluation and Decision Making in Higher Education Toward Equitable Repertoires of Faculty Practice
In this chapter, we propose evaluation and decision-making as activities which, properly reconstructed from conventional norms, can be leveraged to change who and what receives access, opportunities,
Peer Review in Academia
This chapter outlines the notion of peer review and its relation to the autonomy of the academic profession and the contract between science and society and some reasons to further explore different practices ofpeer review.
Do peers share the same criteria for assessing grant applications?
This study examines a basic assumption of peer review, namely, the idea that there is a consensus on evaluation criteria among peers, which is a necessary condition for the reliability of peer judgements, and identifies two consensus classes, two consensus-close classes, and a consensus-far class.


Knowledge, Higher Education, and the New Managerialism: The Changing Management of UK Universities
1. New Managerialism and Public Service Organizational Reform: From Regulated Autonomy to Institutionalized Distrust 2. The Changing Context of University Knowledge Work: the UK Higher Education
The last judgement: exploring intellectual leadership in higher education through academic obituaries
The literature on leadership in higher education is focused mainly on senior academic leaders with managerial roles. It largely excludes informal and distributed forms of intellectual leadership
Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines
Points of departure academic disciplines overlaps, boundaries and specialisms aspects of community life patterns of communication academic careers the wider context implications for theory and
Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs
Academic excellence is allegedly a universal and gender neutral standard of merit. This article examines exactly what is constructed as academic excellence at the micro-level, how evaluators
Inside Graduate Admissions: Merit, Diversity, and Faculty Gatekeeping
Julie Posselt pulls back the curtain on this secret process, revealing how faculty evaluate applicants in top-ranked doctoral programs in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences.
How to become an academic philosopher. Academic discourse as multileveled positioning practice
In my contribution, I will present the power-knowledge approach to academic discourse. Drawing from poststructuralist and pragmatic developments in socialtheory, this model the practical challenge
Disciplinary Logics in Doctoral Admissions: Understanding Patterns of Faculty Evaluation
Ph.D. attainment rates by race and gender vary widely across the disciplines, and previous research has found disciplinary variation in graduate admissions criteria and practices. To better
Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use : a literature review
This review of the international literature on evaluation systems, evaluation practices, and metrics (mis)uses was written as part of a larger review commissioned by the Higher Education Funding Co
Towards Research Performance in the Humanities
It is argued that librarians are not infrequently requested to provide assistance in collecting data related to research performance assessments, and that the methodology described in the paper aims at offering a general framework for such activities, and can be used by librarian as a line of action whenever they become involved.
Ranking and the multiplication of reputation: reflections from the frontier of globalizing higher education
Abstract Over the last two decades, enumeration has become a critical force in crafting the governmentalities of globalizing higher education. Whether in the glossy Web sites and documentation of the