Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs.

@article{Mitchell2007AbusiveSA,
  title={Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs.},
  author={M. Mitchell and M. L. Ambrose},
  journal={The Journal of applied psychology},
  year={2007},
  volume={92 4},
  pages={
          1159-68
        }
}
  • M. Mitchell, M. L. Ambrose
  • Published 2007
  • Medicine, Psychology
  • The Journal of applied psychology
  • In this study, the authors examine the relationship between abusive supervision and employee workplace deviance. The authors conceptualize abusive supervision as a type of aggression. They use work on retaliation and direct and displaced aggression as a foundation for examining employees' reactions to abusive supervision. The authors predict abusive supervision will be related to supervisor-directed deviance, organizational deviance, and interpersonal deviance. Additionally, the authors examine… CONTINUE READING

    Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper.

    Explore Further: Topics Discussed in This Paper

    Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees' workplace deviance: A power/dependence analysis
    364

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 93 REFERENCES
    Consequences of Abusive Supervision
    1932
    Abusive supervision and subordinates' organizational citizenship behavior.
    660
    Justice constructs, negative affectivity, and employee deviance: a proposed model and empirical test
    465
    Moderators of the relationships between coworkers' organizational citizenship behavior and fellow employees' attitudes.
    308
    Exploring the role of individual differences in the prediction of workplace aggression.
    494
    Personality moderators of the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates' resistance.
    251
    Predicting workplace aggression: a meta-analysis.
    653
    RETALIATION IN THE WORKPLACE: THE ROLES OF DISTRIBUTIVE, PROCEDURAL, AND INTERACTIONAL JUSTICE
    1836