• Corpus ID: 142005126

Abortion, Persuasion, and Emotion: Implications of Social Science Research on Emotion for Reading Casey

@article{Blumenthal2007AbortionPA,
  title={Abortion, Persuasion, and Emotion: Implications of Social Science Research on Emotion for Reading Casey},
  author={Jeremy A. Blumenthal},
  journal={Washington Law Review},
  year={2007},
  volume={83},
  pages={1}
}
Although abortion jurisprudence under Casey condones State efforts to persuade a woman to forego an abortion in favor of childbirth, the opinion's "truthful and not misleading" language can be read more broadly than it traditionally has. Specifically, even a truthful message may mislead when it inappropriately takes advantage of emotional influence to bias an individual's decision away from the decision that would be made in a non-emotional, fully informed, state. Drawing on the insights of… 
A New Approach to Abortion Informed Consent Laws: How An Evidence Law Framework Can Clarify Casey’s Truthful, Non-Misleading Standard
United States Supreme Court doctrine has, for a quarter century, permitted regulations designed—through facts or nudges, but not force—to persuade pregnant women to choose childbirth over abortion.
A Moody View of the Law: Looking Back and Looking Ahead at Law and the Emotions
The current Symposium celebrates 3,400 years of law and emotion. How so? In Leviticus, Chapter 19 Verse 15, judges are instructed to judge rich and poor alike – interestingly, they are, separately,
Emotion and the Law
The field of law and emotion draws from a range of disciplines in the sciences, social sciences, and humanities to shed light on the emotions that pervade the legal system. It utilizes insights from
Forced sonogram and compelled speech abortion regulations: A constitutional analysis
TLDR
It is demonstrated why these abortion regulations violate the ethical principles governing informed consent and why they should be declared unconstitutional based on women’s constitutional rights as settled by Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
FORCED SONOGRAM AND COMPELLED SPEECH ABORTION REGULATIONS
state regulations require women, before undergoing abortions, to be sub- jected to unwanted and nonmedically necessary sonograms, often requiring an intrusive vaginal probe. Physicians, for their
Trust, Reputation, and Law: the Evolution of Commitment in Investment Banking
We discuss the commitment mechanisms that underpin social orderings. We categorize commitments in relationships along a hierarchy that runs from the most extra-legal to the most legally intensive
Informed consent, abortion, and reproductive autonomy

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 29 REFERENCES
Abortion decisions and the duty to screen: clinical, ethical, and legal implications of predictive risk factors of post-abortion maladjustment.
  • D. Reardon
  • Political Science
    The Journal of contemporary health law and policy
  • 2003
TLDR
Reports of a rapid, “easy” decision reflect only a relative freedom from internal conflicts over the decision, and do not eliminate the fact that the abortion experience may have immense consequences for women.
Roe's Legacy: The Nonconsensual Medical Treatment of Pregnant Women and Implications for Female Citizenship
This essay demonstrates that the compelling-state-interest language used by the Court in Roe has been used to constrain and derogate women’s citizenship. Section details Roe’s holding and describes
Law and Social Science in the Twenty-First Century
The use of social science - of psychology in particular - to inform legal theory and practice is fast becoming the latest craze in the pages of legal academia. Despite this increase in research,
Easing Abortion's Pain: Can Fetal Pain Legislation Survive the New Judicial Scrutiny of Legislative Fact-Finding?
Fetal Pain laws have been passed in various states and proposed in Congress. These informed consent-type statutes require abortion physicians to provide a pregnant woman seeking an abortion with
Taking Behavioralism Seriously: The Problem of Market Manipulation
For the past few decades, cognitive psychologists and behavioral researchers have been steadily uncovering evidence that human decisionmaking processes are prone to nonrational, yet systematic,
Lost in a doctrinal wasteland: the exceptionalism of doctor-patient speech within the Rehnquist Court's First Amendment jurisprudence.
TLDR
This chapter discusses how managed care organizations have sought to maximize profits and minimize consumer dissatisfaction by including “gag clauses” in provider contracts, which bar physicians from discussing treatment alternatives and financial incentive arrangements with patients.
The Crystalline Structure of Legal Thought
1981. Research for this Article was funded in part by a grant from the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law. I would like to thank my research assistant, Linda Talley, for her unfailing
The Mechanisms of the Slippery Slope
I. IN T R O D U C T IO N ........................................................................................................................ 1028 I. COST-LOWERING SLIPPERY SLOPES AND OTHER
Crafting a Remedy for the Naughtiness of Procedural Unconscionability
In this article I discuss the consequences of inducing someone to enter into an unconscionable contract and I suggest that there must be limitations on behavior associated with manipulative
...
...