Abduction without Minimality

@inproceedings{Nayak1999AbductionWM,
  title={Abduction without Minimality},
  author={Abhaya C. Nayak and Norman Y. Foo},
  booktitle={Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
  year={1999}
}
  • A. Nayak, N. Foo
  • Published in
    Australian Joint Conference…
    6 December 1999
  • Philosophy
In most accounts of common-sense reasoning, only the most preferred among models supplied by the evidence are retaiined (and the rest eliminated) in order to enhance the inferential prowess. One problem with this strategy is that the agent's working set of models shrinks quickly in the process. We argue that instead of rejecting all the nonbest models, the reasoner should reject only the worst models and then examine the consequences of adopting this principle in the context of abductive… 

Degrees of abductive boldness

TLDR
This work defines and study relations between propositions, some of which employ information to boldly go beyond the cautiousness of conventional inference and may lead to algorithms for new deductive and abductive processes.

On Explanatory Belief revision systems: Initiation Grant Proposal

In this project, a new model for belief revision based on abduction will be elaborated within the framework of AGM belief revision. We construe “abduction” as the process of reasoning in which

Iterated Abduction

TLDR
The present work addresses the problem of iterated abduction, i.e., abducing explanations for a stream of evidence over time, by developing a logical formalism for this process as well as a computational implementation.

Epistemic States Guiding the Rational Dynamics of Information

TLDR
Going from belief sets to more general epistemic states, it is shown how similar constructions may guide AGM belief change.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 16 REFERENCES

Reasoning without Minimality

TLDR
This paper provides a set of “revision postulates” that demonstrably characterises this “non minimal” belief revision operation and argues that the suggested operation is not excessively weak.

The Role of Abductive Reasoning within the Process of Belief Revision

TLDR
The role of abductive inference within a belief revision framework based on the AGM framework is investigated and how abductive expansion is related to nonmonotonic inference, in particular, default reasoning is shown.

Iterated belief change based on epistemic entrenchment

In this paper it is argued that, in order to solve the problem of iterated belief change, both the belief state and its input should be represented as epistemic entrenchment (EE) relations. A belief

Iterated Belief Change Based on Epistemic Entrenchment*

insightful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. I thank the referees for Erkenntnis who, apart from giving extended commen ts and suggestions, provided me with some hard-to-nd relevant

Nonmonotonic Inference Based on Expectations

On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions

TLDR
The authors investigate "partial meet contraction functions", which are defined to yield the intersection of some nonempty family of maximal subsets of the theory that fail to imply the proposition being eliminated, and basic properties of these functions are established.

Logical foundations of artificial intelligence

Reasoning about change

Knowledge in flux: modeling the dynamics of epistemic states

Belief Revision: Belief change and possibility theory