• Corpus ID: 11273628

APACHE-II score correlation with mortality and length of stay in an intensive care unit.

@article{Naved2011APACHEIISC,
  title={APACHE-II score correlation with mortality and length of stay in an intensive care unit.},
  author={Saad Ahmed Naved and Shahla Siddiqui and Fazal Hameed Khan},
  journal={Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP},
  year={2011},
  volume={21 1},
  pages={
          4-8
        }
}
OBJECTIVE To correlate the APACHE-II score system with mortality and length of stay in ICU. [] Key MethodSTUDY DESIGN Cohort study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY The Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, from May 2005 to May 2006. METHODOLOGY All adult patients who were admitted in the ICU were included. APACHE-II score was calculated at the second and seventh days of admission in the ICU.

Figures and Tables from this paper

Evaluation of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II in predicting ICU mortality among critically ill

The APACHE II scoring system has been successful in predicting the mortality of critically ill patients and healthcare professionals should incorporate the disease severity measuring tools in clinical practice to prioritize and optimize the care rendered in critical care units.

APACHE II analysis of a surgical intensive care unit population in a tertiary care hospital in Karachi (Pakistan)

It is recommend, that this simple and cost effective scoring system should be used to identify patients with high risk of death to justify the decisions of withholding expensive therapies in resource limited hospitals.

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score for the assessment of mortality prediction in the intensive care unit: a single-centre study from Iran.

This study shows that an APACHE II score of 15 provides the best diagnostic accuracy to predict mortality of critically ill patients in intensive care unit (ICU) in comparison to the other prestigious centres in the world.

Evaluation of mortality in ICU-hospitalized COVID-19 patients by using REMS, APACHE-II, CCI, and SOFA

It is investigated that REMS, CCI, APACHE-II, and SOFA were effective in determining the in-hospital mortality of critically ill COVID-19 patients; however, no remarkable superiority existed between each other.

Effectiveness of the APACHE II scoring system in an intensive care unit: results of a prospective study.

The role of APACHE II as a scoring system to predict outcomes and to compare actual and expected mortality rates are evaluated to recommend the use of this outcome prediction score for decision-making and classifying patients based on the degree of severity of their diseases in this setting.

Evaluating the Validity of Apache Ii as a Predictor of Icu Mortality for the Critically Ill Patients at Knh’scritical Care Units

The study revealed that APACHE II score is an excellent predictor for mortality as ROC curve was found to be 0.889 with an optimum cut-off value of 20.5 with sensitivity 87.5% and specificity 79.0%.

Mortality prediction in status epilepticus with the APACHE II score

The APACHE II score is a poor predictor of mortality in intensive care unit patients with status epilepticus and its impact on mortality is warranted to develop better measures of acute physiological disease severity in status epilepsypticus.

Predictors and outcome of prolonged stay in the respiratory ICU

Evaluating the characteristics, outcomes, and cost of ICU patients with a prolonged stay and very long stay in Ain Shams University Hospital Respiratory ICUs found Mechanical ventilation, vasopressor support, type of nutrition, BMI, tracheostomy, and Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II Score on admission had a significant association with prolonged ICU stay and mortality.

Evaluation of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II system in a rural critical care setting: Correlating mortality and length of stay

APACHE II system will be of more priority in determining risk population for whom optimum care to be delivered, by which mortality in ICU could be minimized in rural critical care settings.

Comparison of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II and Glasgow Coma Score in predicting the outcomes of Post Anesthesia Care Unit's patients

The survivors had significantly lower APACHE II and higher GCS compared with non-survivors, also GCS showed more predictive accuracy than APAChe II in prognosticating the outcomes in PACU.
...

Verification of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scoring system in a Hong Kong intensive care unit

The APACHE II scoring system was an accurate predictor of group outcome in a Chinese population, making it suitable for comparisons between countries.

Audit of intensive care: a 30 month experience using the Apache II severity of disease classification system

The presence of these large unfavourable groups indicates a change in the admission policy is warranted, and higher than predicted mortality in comparison with centres in the United States of America may be partly explained by the high proportion of the population from these unfavourably groups.

Validation of a severity of illness score (APACHE II) in a surgical intensive care unit

The admission characteristics and hospital mortality of 598 consecutive patients admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) using a severity of disease classification system (APACHE II) on the first day of admission were measured.

Performance evaluation of APACHE II score for an Indian patient with respiratory problems.

Observed and predicted mortality rose with 5-point APACHE II score, but did not correlate with observed mortality for critically ill patients admitted to an Indian respiratory ICU, as well as in determination of model validity in critically ill Indian patients with respiratory problems.

Outcome prediction models on admission in a medical intensive care unit: do they predict individual outcome?

It is concluded that the estimation of risk on admission by the three methods investigated might be helpful for global comparisons of ICU populations, although the lack of disease specificity reduces their applicability for severity grading of a given illness.

Accuracy and reliability of APACHE II scoring in two intensive care units

It is concluded that wide variability exists in APACHE II scoring in everyday clinical practice, with the score being generally overestimated.

Evaluation of APACHE II system among intensive care patients at a teaching hospital.

The APACHE II system was applied within an intensive care unit to evaluate its ability to predict patient outcome; to compare illness severity with outcomes for clinical and surgical patients; and to compare the recorded result with the predicted death rate.

Short-and long-term prognosis, functional outcome following ICU for elderly

Age, previous health status and SAPS had a predictor value of one-year mortality for ICU survivors, and 103 patients were alive at one year.

Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluations II and III and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II: A prospective cohort study evaluating these methods to predict outcome in a German interdisciplinary intensive care unit

Hospital mortality was higher than predicted for both new models but was underestimated to a greater degree by APACHE III, while both score systems demonstrated a considerable variation across the spectrum of diagnostic categories, which also differed between the two models.