• DOI:10.3847/1538-4357/abbe24
• Corpus ID: 222090720

ALMA Observations and Modeling of the Rotating Outflow in Orion Source I

@article{LopezVazquez2020ALMAOA,
  title={ALMA Observations and Modeling of the Rotating Outflow in Orion Source I},
  author={J. A. L'opez-V'azquez and Luis A. Zapata and S. Lizano and Jorge Cant'o},
  journal={arXiv: Solar and Stellar Astrophysics},
  year={2020}
}

• J. A. L'opez-V'azquez, L. Zapata, +1 author J. Cant'o
• Published 30 September 2020
• Physics, Geology
• arXiv: Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

We present $^{29}$SiO(J=8--7) $\nu$=0, SiS (J=19--18) $\nu$=0, and $^{28}$SiO (J=8--7) $\nu$=1 molecular line archive observations made with the Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array (ALMA) of the molecular outflow associated with Orion Source I. The observations show velocity asymmetries about the flow axis which are interpreted as outflow rotation. We find that the rotation velocity ($\sim$4--8 km s$^{-1}$) decreases with the vertical distance to the disk. In contrast, the cylindrical radius ($\sim$100--300 au), the expansion velocity ($\sim$2--15 km s$^{-1}$), and the axial velocity $v_{\rm z}$ ($\sim$-1--10 km s$^{-1}$) increase with the vertical distance. The mass estimated of the molecular outflow $\mathrm{M}_{\rm outflow}\sim$0.66--1.3 M$_\odot$. Given a kinematic time $\sim$130 yr, this implies a mass loss rate $\dot{\mathrm{M}}_{\rm outflow} \sim 5.1-10 \times 10^{-3}$ M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$. This massive outflow sets important contraints on disk wind models. We compare the observations with a model of a shell produced by the interaction between an anisotropic stellar wind and an Ulrich accretion flow that corresponds to a rotating molecular envelope in collapse. We find that the model cylindrical radii are consistent with the $^{29}$SiO(J=8--7) $\nu$=0 data. The expansion velocities and the axial velocities of the model are similar the observed values, except close to the disk ($z\sim\pm$150 au) for the expansion velocity. Nevertheless, the rotation velocities of the model are a factor $\sim$3--10 lower than the observed values. We conclude that the Ulrich flow alone cannot explain the rotation observed and other possibilities should be explored, like the inclusion of the angular momentum of a disk wind.