Corpus ID: 26776998

ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 17, June 2000 (Replaces Technical Bulletin Number 196, August 1994)

@inproceedings{2011ACOGPB,
  title={ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 17, June 2000 (Replaces Technical Bulletin Number 196, August 1994)},
  author={},
  year={2011}
}
  • Published 2011
This Practice Bulletin was developed by the ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins— Obstetrics with the assistance of Michael Belfort, MD. The information is designed to aid practitioners in making decisions about appropriate obstetric and gynecologic care. These guidelines should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of treatment or procedure. Variations in practice may be warranted based on the needs of the individual patient, resources, and limitations unique to the institution or… Expand

Tables from this paper

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 45 REFERENCES
Validation of the 1988 ACOG Forceps Classification System
TLDR
A prospective study of 357 forceps deliveries classified using each system validates the 1988 classification scheme for forceps operations, with results indicating greater stratification of the risks of short-term neonatal and maternal morbidity. Expand
Operative Vaginal Delivery: A Survey of Fellows of ACOG
TLDR
Practice patterns reflect differences in residency training; the more recently trained Fellows more often were taught and use vacuum for delivery. Expand
A continuing use for Kielland's forceps?
TLDR
Support is offered for the continuing role of Kielland's forceps in modern obstetrical practice with no difference in Apgar score, the need for active resuscitation, incidence of jaundice or abnormal neurological behaviour. Expand
North Staffordshire/Wigan assisted delivery trial
TLDR
There was a significantly higher rate of maternal morbidity in terms of perineal trauma and discomfort in the forceps group compared to the silicone cup group, and no differences in neonatal morbidity were detected. Expand
Failed instrumental delivery: how safe is the use of a second instrument?
TLDR
An audit of failed instrumental deliveries was undertaken to assess the incidence of complications and the adequacy of documentation, and it was found that severe maternal or perinatal complications could be avoided by adequate pre-application assessment, standard conduct of instrumental delivery and full documentation. Expand
Midforceps deliveries: long-term outcome of infants.
TLDR
Infants delivered by midforceps between 1976 and 1982 were evaluated for evidence of developmental delay or neurological deficit by chart review and there was no significant difference in abnormal outcomes in the two groups. Expand
Subaponeurotic haemorrhage in Malaysian neonates.
  • N. Boo
  • Medicine
  • Singapore medical journal
  • 1990
TLDR
It is suggested that subaponeurotic haemorrhage in Malaysian neonates was commonly associated with vacuum extraction and was not a benign condition. Expand
Forceps-assisted vaginal delivery.
  • A. Gei, M. Belfort
  • Medicine
  • Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America
  • 1999
TLDR
Operative vaginal delivery using forceps has been an important part of obstetric practice for nearly 400 years and Physicians must make every effort to retain these skills, to modify and improve them in every possible way, and to pass them on. Expand
A comparison of the morbidity of midforceps and cesarean delivery.
TLDR
There was no increase in significant short-term neonatal morbidity in the midforceps group, while maternal morbidity was higher in the cesarean delivery group. Expand
Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of low-forceps delivery according to the new criteria of The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery in term pregnancies.
TLDR
Elective low forceps delivery may be used to shorten the second stage of labor without immediate maternal or neonatal side effects. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...