ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery).

@article{Eagle2004ACCAHA2G,
  title={ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery).},
  author={K. Eagle and R. Guyton and R. Davidoff and F. Edwards and G. Ewy and T. Gardner and J. Hart and H. Herrmann and L. Hillis and A. Hutter and B. Lytle and R. A. Marlow and W. Nugent and T. Orszulak and E. Antman and Sidney C. Smith and J. Alpert and Jeffrey L. Anderson and D. Faxon and V. Fuster and R. Gibbons and G. Gregoratos and J. Halperin and L. Hiratzka and S. Hunt and A. Jacobs and J. Ornato},
  journal={Circulation},
  year={2004},
  volume={110 9},
  pages={
          1168-76
        }
}
The American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Task Force on Practice Guidelines regularly reviews existing guidelines to determine when an update or full revision is needed. This process gives priority to areas where major changes in text, particularly recommendations, are mentioned on the basis of new understanding of evidence. Minor changes in verbiage and references are discouraged. The ACC/AHA Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery published in 1999… Expand

Paper Mentions

Observational Patient Registry Clinical Trial
The MONET registry will include any patient with previous coronary stenting undergoing any type of surgery or operative endoscopic/endovascular procedure. The effects of the… Expand
ConditionsCoronary Disease
The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation guideline for coronary artery bypass grafting: 2011 updates.
TLDR
The American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association have now updated the Practice Guidelines for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery, suggesting that patients with anatomic conditions associated with a low risk of PCI procedural complications and a high likelihood of good long-term outcome might benefit from left main PCI. Expand
2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
TLDR
This work states that patient-specific modifiers, comorbidities, and issues of patient preference that might influence the choice of particular tests or therapies are considered, as well as frequency of follow-up and cost effectiveness. Expand
ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Sidney C. Smith, T. Feldman, +21 authors B. Riegel
  • Medicine
  • Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
  • 2006
The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (ACC/AHA/SCAI) 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary InterventionExpand
ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation
TLDR
This paper presents the results of a two-week study conducted at the American College of ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Care for Noncardiac Surgery of patients with a history of atrial fibrillation and findings that support the belief that noncardiac surgery should be considered as a second line of treatment for atypical heart failure. Expand
AHA/ACC guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update: endorsed by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
TLDR
The development of the present statement involved a process of partial adaptation of other guideline statements and reports and supplemental literature searches, which confirmed that aggressive comprehensive risk factor management improves survival, reduces recurrent events and the need for interventional procedures, and improves quality of life for patients with established coronary disease. Expand
AHA/ACC guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update endorsed by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
TLDR
The development of the present statement involved a process of partial adaptation of other guideline statements and reports and supplemental literature searches, which confirmed that aggressive comprehensive risk factor management improves survival, reduces recurrent events and the need for interventional procedures, and improves quality of life for patients with established coronary disease. Expand
Adherence of Catheterization Laboratory Cardiologists to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: What Happens in Actual Practice?
TLDR
Patients with coronary artery disease receive more recommendations for PCI and fewer recommendations for CABG surgery than indicated in the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. Expand
ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (ACC/AHA/SCAI) 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary InterventionExpand
ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines
TLDR
This guideline is pleased to have this guideline developed in conjunction with the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and to have been selected from all 3 organizations to examine subject-specific data and write guidelines. Expand
ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2016 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, Ameri
TLDR
This update provides a reassessment of clinical scenarios that the writing group felt to be affected by significant changes in the medical literature or gaps from prior criteria, to provide a framework for the assessment of practice patterns that will hopefully improve physician decision making. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 946 REFERENCES
ACC/AHA guidelines and indications for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery).
TLDR
A Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures was established in 1980 with the following charge: examining the impact of developing technology on the practice and cost of medical care. Expand
Management of heart failure. III. The role of revascularization in the treatment of patients with moderate or severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
TLDR
Coronary artery bypass grafting improves 3-year survival by approximately 30% to 50% and physical functioning by approximately one New York Heart Association class in patients with moderate to severe left ventricular dysfunction and limiting angina. Expand
Public release of cardiac surgery outcomes data in New York: what do New York state cardiologists think of it?
TLDR
A majority of cardiologists has not generally changed their well-established referral patterns as a result of the New York coronary artery bypass graft surgery reports, however, there has been a modest impact on referrals resulting from the distribution of these reports. Expand
Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the Ad Hoc Committee, American Heart Association.
TLDR
This statement states that the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke has halted the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) because of a clear benefit in favor of surgery for patients with carotid stenosis as measured by diameter reduction. Expand
Outcome as a function of annual coronary artery bypass graft volume. The Ad Hoc Committee on Cardiac Surgery Credentialing of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
TLDR
Although the data are practice-group-specific only, there was no clinically relevant correlation of volume to outcome except at extremely low annual volume (less than 100 cases per year). Expand
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Ontario and New York State: which rate is right? Steering Committee of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario.
TLDR
Retrospective analysis of data from cardiac surgery registries in New York and Ontario suggests potential underservicing in Ontario is suggested by a lower rate of CABG surgery for left main disease; however, the higher rates of CabG surgery in NewYork is also associated with a strikingly higher rate of surgery in patients with limited coronary disease. Expand
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Ontario and New York State: Which Rate Is Right?
TLDR
This study showed similarly high rates of appropriate utilization in Canada and New York despite a much lower rate of CABG surgery in Canada, and provided prima facie evidence for underuse in Canada. Expand
Assessing the outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery: how many risk factors are enough? Steering Committee of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario.
TLDR
A small number of core variables appear to be sufficient for fairly comparing risk-adjusted mortality rates across hospitals in Ontario and for efficient interprovider comparisons, risk-adjustment models for CABG could be simplified so that only essential variables are included in these models. Expand
Changes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: 1987-1990. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.
TLDR
The characteristics of the cohort of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting changed substantially from 1987 to 1990, and these changes should be considered when interpreting surgical outcomes. Expand
Previous coronary artery bypass grafting is not a risk factor for aortic valve replacement.
TLDR
Valve replacement should, therefore, be pursued despite prior CABG when hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis develops, and a circumspect approach to "prophylactic" AVR for mild aorta stenosis at primary CABGs seems warranted. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...