A systematic review on the effectiveness of anti-choking suction devices and identification of research gaps.

@article{Dunne2020ASR,
  title={A systematic review on the effectiveness of anti-choking suction devices and identification of research gaps.},
  author={Cheryl Lynn Dunne and Amy E. Peden and Ana Catarina Queiroga and C. G{\'o}mez Gonz{\'a}lez and B. Valesco and David Szpilman},
  journal={Resuscitation},
  year={2020}
}

Phase One of a Global Evaluation of Suction-Based Airway Clearance Devices in Foreign Body Airway Obstructions: A Retrospective Descriptive Analysis

Initial available data has shown ACDs to be promising in the treatment of choking, however, limitations in data collection methods and quality exist.

A Protocol for the Prospective Evaluation of Novel Suction-Based Airway Clearance Devices in the Treatment of Foreign Body Airway Obstructions

This research has two aims: to investigate what situational and patient factors are frequently identified, and which are associated with relief of the FBAO and survival in individuals with FBAOs treated with an ACD; and to describe the experience of individuals who have used ACDs in response to a F BAO and identify facilitators and barriers to the use of ACDs compared to traditional interventions.

Lebensrettende Maßnahmen bei Kindern (Paediatric Life Support, PLS)

Die Leitlinien des European Resuscitation Council (ERC) zu den lebensrettenden Maßnahmen bei Kindern (Paediatric Life Support, PLS) basieren auf dem 2020 verfassten „International Consensus on

A protocol for the multi-method evaluation of novel externally applied suction-based airway clearance devices in the treatment of foreign body airway obstructions

To describe the experience of individuals who have used suction-based airway clearance devices in response to a FBAO and identify facilitators and barriers to the use of ACDs compared to traditional interventions and contribute to informing future resuscitation guidelines.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 27 REFERENCES

Successful Use of a Novel Device Called the Lifevac ton Resuscitate Choking Victims World-wide Results

Results of worldwide experience using the Lifevac in real life emergencies show that the unit has been used successfully 100% of the time with limited to no side effects reported, and should be considered as an option during a choking emergency when standard protocol fails.

Adult Foreign Body Airway Obstruction in the Prehospital Setting

  • A. SoroudiHolly E Shipp G. Vilke
  • Medicine
    Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors
  • 2007
The frequency, etiologies, and treatments of foreign body airway obstruction in adults in the prehospital setting are described and the relative efficacies of treatments and presenting factors that predict overall patient outcome are discussed.

Airway obstruction in children aged less than 5 years: the prehospital experience.

A life-saving maneuver to prevent food-choking.

Experimental studies and the clinical evaluation of a simple maneuver that prevents food-choking fatalities are described and the episode is sometimes confused with a myocardial infarction, although the signs and symptoms of the two are different.

Flexible Bronchoscopic Removal of Foreign Bodies from Pediatric Airways

In selected patients, flexible bronchoscopic removal of even large foreign bodies is feasible provided that the bronchoscopist is prepared to manage potential complications associated with the procedure and successfully employ the rigid bronchoscope if the flexible Bronchoscopic technique fails.

An interprovincial comparison of unintentional childhood injury rates in Canada for the period 2006–2012

Although the unintentional injury hospitalization rate is decreasing over time, some subcauses such as choking/suffocation have shown an increase in certain provinces, and evidence-based childhood injury prevention policies should be standardized across Canada.

ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions

Risk of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions is developed, a new tool for evaluating risk of bias in estimates of the comparative effectiveness of interventions from studies that did not use randomisation to allocate units or clusters of individuals to comparison groups.