A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools

@article{Katrak2004ASR,
  title={A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools},
  author={Persis Katrak and Andrea Emmi Bialocerkowski and Nicola M Massy-Westropp and V S Saravana Kumar and Karen Grimmer},
  journal={BMC Medical Research Methodology},
  year={2004},
  volume={4},
  pages={22 - 22}
}
BACKGROUND Consumers of research (researchers, administrators, educators and clinicians) frequently use standard critical appraisal tools to evaluate the quality of published research reports. However, there is no consensus regarding the most appropriate critical appraisal tool for allied health research. We summarized the content, intent, construction and psychometric properties of published, currently available critical appraisal tools to identify common elements and their relevance to allied… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 92 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 116 references

AD: Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook 4.2.0 Oxford: The Cochrane Collaboration

  • M Clarke, Oxman
  • 2003
Highly Influential
13 Excerpts

Interrater agreement of Jadad's scale

  • O Clark, AA Castro, JV Filho, B Djubelgovic
  • Annual Cochrane Colloqium Abstracts October
  • 2001
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…