A systematic review of outcome reporting in colorectal cancer surgery.

@article{Whistance2013ASR,
  title={A systematic review of outcome reporting in colorectal cancer surgery.},
  author={R N Whistance and Rachael O Forsythe and Angus G K McNair and Sara T. Brookes and Kerry N L Avery and A. M. Pullyblank and Paul A. Sylvester and D. G. Jayne and Jacqueline E. Jones and Julia Brown and M G Coleman and Susan J Dutton and Rj Hackett and Richard Huxtable and R H Kennedy and Dion Morton and Alfred Oliver and Anne-Marie Russell and Mark G. Thomas and Jane M. Blazeby},
  journal={Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland},
  year={2013},
  volume={15 10},
  pages={
          e548-60
        }
}
  • R N Whistance, Rachael O Forsythe, +17 authors Jane M. Blazeby
  • Published in
    Colorectal disease : the…
    2013
  • Medicine
  • AIM Evaluation of surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) is necessary to inform clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The standards of outcome reporting after CRC surgery have not previously been considered. METHOD Systematic literature searches identified randomized and nonrandomized prospective studies reporting clinical outcomes of CRC surgery. Outcomes were listed verbatim, categorized into broad groups (outcome domains) and examined for a definition (an appropriate textual… CONTINUE READING

    Create an AI-powered research feed to stay up to date with new papers like this posted to ArXiv

    Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper.

    Citations

    Publications citing this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 33 CITATIONS

    Comprehensive Rectal Cancer Care

    VIEW 7 EXCERPTS
    CITES BACKGROUND
    HIGHLY INFLUENCED

    Outcome reporting in bariatric surgery: an in-depth analysis to inform the development of a core outcome set, the BARIACT Study.

    VIEW 5 EXCERPTS
    CITES BACKGROUND & METHODS

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 101 REFERENCES