A systematic assessment of the quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses in radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma.

@article{Wang2014ASA,
  title={A systematic assessment of the quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses in radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma.},
  author={Yingqiang Wang and Qianqian Luo and Youping Li and Shaolin Deng and Xianglian Li and Shiyou Wei},
  journal={Journal of evidence-based medicine},
  year={2014},
  volume={7 2},
  pages={103-20}
}
OBJECTIVES The systematic reviews (SRs) of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus hepatic resection (HR) for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are increasing with varies qualities. The aim of this study is to evaluate quality and their impacts on outcomes of these studies. METHODS We searched six databases and five official websites to find the SRs of RFA versus HR for early HCC. The Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire (OQAQ), the Cochrane Collaboration's tool, and modified MINORS… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 2 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS