A survey of interestingness measures for knowledge discovery

@article{McGarry2005ASO,
  title={A survey of interestingness measures for knowledge discovery},
  author={Kenneth McGarry},
  journal={Knowledge Eng. Review},
  year={2005},
  volume={20},
  pages={39-61}
}
  • Kenneth McGarry
  • Published 2005
  • Computer Science
  • Knowledge Eng. Review
  • It is a well-known fact that the data mining process can generate many hundreds and often thousands of patterns from data. [...] Key Method These so-called interestingness measures are generally divided into two categories: objective measures based on the statistical strengths or properties of the discovered patterns and subjective measures that are derived from the user's beliefs or expectations of their particular problem domain. We evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the various interestingness measures…Expand Abstract

    Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper.

    Explore key concepts

    Links to highly relevant papers for key concepts in this paper:

    Citations

    Publications citing this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 306 CITATIONS

    A Survey of Interestingness Measures for Association Rules

    VIEW 1 EXCERPT
    CITES BACKGROUND

    Behavior-based clustering and analysis of interestingness measures for association rule mining

    VIEW 4 EXCERPTS
    CITES BACKGROUND & METHODS
    HIGHLY INFLUENCED

    FILTER CITATIONS BY YEAR

    2003
    2020

    CITATION STATISTICS

    • 13 Highly Influenced Citations

    • Averaged 11 Citations per year from 2018 through 2020

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 87 REFERENCES

    What Makes Patterns Interesting in Knowledge Discovery Systems

    VIEW 4 EXCERPTS
    HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

    Finding Interesting Patterns Using User Expectations

    VIEW 3 EXCERPTS
    HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

    Interestingness via what is not interesting

    VIEW 2 EXCERPTS