A study of argumentation-based negotiation in collaborative design

  title={A study of argumentation-based negotiation in collaborative design},
  author={Yan Jin and Mathieu Geslin},
  journal={Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing},
  pages={35 - 48}
  • Yan JinMathieu Geslin
  • Published 29 January 2010
  • Business
  • Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing
Abstract Engineering of complex systems often involves teamwork. The members of an engineering team must work together to identify design requirements, explore design spaces, generate design alternatives, and make both interactive and joint design decisions. Because of the latency of information and the disciplinary differences, it is often a difficult process for the members of a team to reach agreements when needed. Negotiation has been studied as a method for facilitating information… 

Multitarget Hierarchical Negotiation for Distributed Design in Collaborative Product Development

This study solves automating engineering collaborations with secure information sharing by improving the negotiation mechanism based on the price schedules decomposition algorithm, which only allows bi-level negotiation with a single design target, in two regards.

Multi-agent negotiation based on price schedules algorithm for distributed collaborative design

This study proposes a negotiation mechanism based on a price schedules decomposition algorithm originally developed in economics that searches for globally optimal designs, where no participant is necessary to own full knowledge of the entire design space.

Authentic Thinking with Argumentation: Putting on the Thinking Caps of Scientists and Designers

A growing number of science educators make efforts to facilitate participation in authentic practices, such as scientific experiment and inquiry-based learning. In science education, integrating

Team Based Negotiation Of Ideas On Design Decision Making Performance

Sean Brophy, Purdue University Sean P. Brophy, PhD. is an assistant professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Dr. Brophy is a learning scientist and engineer; his research focuses on

A qualitative study of collaborative stimulation in group design thinking

It is often assumed in both education and industry that collaboration encourages creativity. This assumption is explored by investigating the influence of designers’ interactions on

An exercise in design process simulation using agent models based on Bayesian global optimization

This research represents an initial step by the authors toward the overall goal of simulating the fundamental features of the activity of designing complex engineered systems, and represents a promising avenue for future extensions and follow-up studies of more complex and realistic design process structures.

A Study of Student Design Team Behaviors in Complex System Design

Large-scale engineering systems require design teams to balance complex sets of considerations using a wide range of design and decision-making skills. Formal, computational approaches for optimizing

Observations of designer behaviors in complex system design

The design of large-scale engineering systems requires design teams to balance a complex set of considerations. Formal approaches for optimizing complex system design assume that designers behave in

Design Principles for Leveraging Sustainability in Business Modelling Tools

The results of design science research study develop a set of design principles for reflecting sustainability in business models, which are refined and evaluated in several cycles and can support practitioners in (re-)designing tools, selecting and innovating business models and serve as a step towards more advances theories regarding software tools for sustainability inbusiness modelling.



Argumentation-based negotiation for collaborative engineering design

An argumentation based engineering negotiation approach is proposed that provides a structured framework for designers to specify design situations, compose arguments, and make joint decisions by following various strategies.

Agent Based Negotiation for Collaborative Design Decision Making


Results of applying the methodology to different scenarios have shown that the CONVINCER provides efficient, effective, and sustainable solutions, thus improving the conflict resolution paradigm in the A/E/C industry.

The Dynamics of Collaborative Design: Insights from Complex Systems and Negotiation Research

Recent research from the complex systems and negotiation literatures has much to offer to the understanding of the dynamics of this process and suggestions for improving collaborative design are offered.

Argumentation-based negotiation

This article provides a conceptual framework through which the core elements and features required by agents engaged in argumentation-based negotiation, as well as the environment that hosts these agents are outlined, and surveys and evaluates existing proposed techniques in the literature.

Agents That Reason and Negotiate by Arguing

A framework, based upon a system of argumentation, which permits agents to negotiate in order to establish acceptable ways of solving problems and describes a case study of this relationship for a particular class of architectures (namely those for belief-desire-intention agents).

Formalizing Negotiation in Engineering Design

A more comprehensive justification is presented here of the approach to modelling imprecision known as the Method of Imprecision, or MoI, than has previously been offered.

Towards a Systematic Repository of Knowledge about Managing Collaborative Design Conflicts

A growing repository of conflict management expertise is described, built as an augmentation of the MIT Process Handbook, that is designed to address these challenges.

Intergroup Negotiations

In this study, the performance of individual and team negotiators is compared. From an intergroup relations perspective, teams may be impeded by their competitive orientation and low levels of

The Use of Groupware for Collaboration in Distributed Student Engineering Design Teams

Limits of the hardware, software, and network bandwidth available at the time the study was conducted diminished any potential benefits of video connectivity and application sharing for distributed collaboration; however, audio connectivity was observed to be of great utility.