A stated preference approach to assessing health care-quality improvements in Palestine: from theoretical validity to policy implications.

Abstract

User fees have been promoted as a potential complementary funding mechanism for health care in developing countries. In this paper, we appraise the use of contingent valuation (CV) as a tool to help develop user fees schemes that could be used to assist in allocating, and partially fund, health care. A random sample of 499 patients seeking care in primary health care centers, in Palestine, were asked to reveal their willingness to pay values for specified improvements in the quality of delivered medical care. Empirical analysis suggests that, in this context, CV can lead to internally consistent results and useful policy implications.

0204060'05'06'07'08'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17
Citations per Year

72 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 72 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Mataria2004ASP, title={A stated preference approach to assessing health care-quality improvements in Palestine: from theoretical validity to policy implications.}, author={Awad Mataria and Cam Donaldson and St{\'e}phane Luchini and Jean Paul Moatti}, journal={Journal of health economics}, year={2004}, volume={23 6}, pages={1285-311} }