A security regime among democracies: cooperation among Iroquois nations

@article{Crawford1994ASR,
  title={A security regime among democracies: cooperation among Iroquois nations},
  author={Neta C. Crawford},
  journal={International Organization},
  year={1994},
  volume={48},
  pages={345 - 385}
}
  • Neta C. Crawford
  • Published 1 June 1994
  • Political Science
  • International Organization
In precolonial and colonial North America five Iroquois nations, which previously had fought for generations, stopped wars among themselves and lived in peace for about 325 years. This history raises several questions: why did the Iroquois nations stop fighting each other; did the fact that each nation was a democracy have anything to do with the end of war among them; and what are the lessons of this peace for international relations scholars? A security regime formed by the Iroquois in 1450… 

The Domestic Democratic Peace in the Middle East

The democratic peace theory has two complementary variants regarding intrastate conflicts: the “democratic civil peace” thesis sees democratic regimes as pacifying internal tensions; the “anocratic

The Great Law of Peace: Alternative Inter-Nation(al) Practices and the Iroquoian Confederacy

In one sense. The Great Law of Peace, a document of the Iroquois nations - the Mohawks, the Seneca, the Cayuga, the Oneida, and the Onondaga - appears to be merely a straightforward and uncomplicated

Explaining Wars Fought by Established Democracies: Do Institutional Constraints Matter?

Extant research has shown that cross-national variations in the level of a country ’s democracy tend to be related to its propensity to be involved in external conflict. The dyadic version of the

Regime types and status quo evaluations: Power transition theory and the democratic peace

A tremendous amount of attention is paid to whether or not joint democracy precludes wars within dyads. Although there now seems to be some measure of consensus that democracies rarely or never fight

Indigeneity and Peace

Indigenous peoples pre-date the contemporary world system of nation-states, and yet are now bound with this global scheme through asymmetric power relations of colonialism. As colonial exchanges saw

The Frontiers of American Grand Strategy: Settlers, Elites, and the Standing Army in America's Indian Wars

Much work on U.S. grand strategy focuses on the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. If the United States did have a grand strategy before that, IR scholars often pay little attention to it, and

Inter‐national affairs: Indigeneity, Globality and the Canadian state

Since the early‐1990s, Indigenous voices in global politics have been growing in strength, in numbers, and in their demonstrated ability to affect outcomes on a range of important issues. The latter,

DOES DEMOCRACY CAUSE PEACE

The idea that democratic states have not fought and are not likely to fight interstate wars against each other runs counter to the realist and neorealist theoretical traditions that have dominated

Sovereignty, property, and indigeneity: the relationship between Aboriginal North America and the modern state in historical and geographical context

Accounting for indigenous forms of sovereignty poses difficult problems for the discipline of International Relations, which is framed by the story of the modern, territorial European state. Most

Regions and Powers: EU-Europe: the European Union and its ‘near abroad’

EU-Europe is the most institutionalised part of the world. Although the exact nature of the EU is hotly debated, its experiment in post-sovereign politics undoubtedly pushes peaceful, regional
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 67 REFERENCES

Powerful Pacifists: Democratic States and War

  • David A. Lake
  • Political Science
    American Political Science Review
  • 1992
Democracies are less likely to fight wars with each other. They are also more likely to prevail in wars with autocratic states. I offer an explanation of this syndrome of powerful pacifism drawn from

Democracy and Peace

The observation that democracies rarely if ever fight each other was made by Dean Babst nearly three decades ago, but has had little impact on the literature on peace research and international

Liberalism and World Politics

  • M. Doyle
  • Political Science
    American Political Science Review
  • 1986
Building on a growing literature in international political science, I reexamine the traditional liberal claim that governments founded on a respect for individual liberty exercise “restraint” and

Detection and Defection: Security ‘régimes’ and the Management of International Conflict

Since the concept of international regime was first introduced just a decade ago, a great deal has been written about the contribution of regimes to the management of international conflict. Yet the

Peace Between Participatory Polities: A Cross-Cultural Test of the “Democracies Rarely Fight Each Other” Hypothesis

Evidence is accumulating that, in the modern international system, democracies rarely fight each other. But the reasons for the phenomenon are not well understood. This article explores a similar

Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World

By illuminating the conflict-resolving mechanisms inherent in the relationships between democracies, Bruce Russett explains one of the most promising developments of the modern international system:

Force and Statecraft: Diplomatic Problems of Our Time

The international system from the seventeenth century to the present: The emergence of the great powers Eighteenth-century diplomacy Balance of power, 1815-1914: three experiments System-building,

Democracy and the Management of International Conflict

The research reported here extends investigation of the democracy-war hypothesis by focusing on the norms of dispute resolution integral to the democratic process. If we extend these norms to the

Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order, 1648-1989

Preface 1. On the study of war 2. Munster and Osnabruck: peace by pieces 3. War and peace in the era of the heroic warriors, 1648-1713 4. Act Two of the hegemony drama: the Utrecht settlements 5. The

Nuclear learning and U.S.–Soviet security regimes

  • J. Nye
  • Political Science
    International Organization
  • 1987
The concepts of regimes and learning have been developed in the Liberal theory of international relations, but their application has been mostly in the area of international political economy.
...