A scientometric analysis of controversies in the field of intelligence research

  title={A scientometric analysis of controversies in the field of intelligence research},
  author={Noah Carl and Michael A Woodley Of Menie},
6 Citations

Figures and Tables from this paper

Communicating Intelligence Research
This article discusses ongoing tensions between academic freedom and social responsibility and provides suggestions for thinking about communication and effective research translation and implementation of intelligence research from the frameworks of science and policy research communication.
The Mythical Taboo on Race and Intelligence
Recent discussions have revived old claims that hereditarian research on race differences in intelligence has been subject to a long and effective taboo. We argue that given the extensive
Defending Biobehavioral Science
We argue for the superiority of biologically informed models of human behavior and behavioral variation relative to their purely sociocultural/environmental competitors. It will be shown that
Enlightenment Never


Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography
Since the publication of " The Bell Curve, " many commentators have offered opinions about human intelligence that misstate current scientific evidence. Some conclusions dismissed in the media as
The Perils of Classifying Political Orientation From Text
The effectiveness of text classification algorithms for classifying ideology in the context of US politics is studied, finding that the cross-domain learning performance is poor, even though the algorithms perform very well in within-dataset cross-validation tests.
What Do Undergraduates Learn About Human Intelligence? An Analysis of Introductory Psychology Textbooks
Human intelligence is an important construct in psychology, with far-reaching implications, providing insights into fields as diverse as neurology, international development, and sociology.
Science Is Not Always “Self-Correcting”
Some prominent scientists and philosophers have stated openly that moral and political considerations should influence whether we accept or promulgate scientific theories. This widespread view has
Political correctness and the study of racial differences
I tabulate international data showing Africans and Asians scoring at opposite ends of a continuum with Europeans falling in the middle. This Asian-European-African gradient occurs in mean scores on a
The Mismeasure of Man
In this edition Dr. Gould has written a substantial new introduction telling how and why he wrote the book and tracing the subsequent history of the controversy on innateness right through The Bell Curve.
Darwin 200: Should scientists study race and IQ? YES: The scientific truth must be pursued
In this, the second of two opposing commentaries, Stephen Ceci and Wendy M. Williams argue that research on the genetics of race and gender should be pursued without restriction, and why such research is both morally defensible and important for the pursuit of truth.
Does Apologizing Work? An Empirical Test of the Conventional Wisdom
Politicians and other public figures often apologize after making controversial statements. While it is assumed that they are wise to do so, this proposition has yet to be tested empirically. There
Darwin 200: Should scientists study race and IQ? NO: Science and society do not benefit
  • S. Rose
  • Sociology, Medicine
  • 2009
The second of Nature's three Darwin 200 special issues celebrates 'everybody's Darwin' — the great man's legacy in the context of the human condition and explains why research on the genetics of race and gender should be pursued without restriction.
Individual and field citation distributions in 29 broad scientific fields
The results have important conceptual and practical consequences: to understand the skewness of field citation distributions at any aggregate level, it must simply explain the skewaness of the individual citation distributions of their very productive authors.