A review of theory and practice in scientometrics

  title={A review of theory and practice in scientometrics},
  author={John Mingers and Loet Leydesdorff},

Figures and Tables from this paper

Evolution of Literature on Scientometric Indicators
  • Education
    Scholarly Content and Its Evolution by Scientometric Indicators
  • 2019
An unbiased and reasonable research evaluation should reflect the diversity and impact of research productivity. The evaluation of scientific research is essential to determine its achievement,
Data Mining in Scientometrics: Usage Analysis for Academic Publications
This work considers download and citation statistics of the journal “Europhysics Letters” (EPL), as Europe's flagship letters journal of broad interest to the physics community, and discusses peculiarities of both processes and correlations between them.
Engaging scientometrics in information systems
This study makes a contribution by raising the discourse surrounding the value of scientometric research in IS, and proposes a framework that uncovers the multi-dimensional bases for citation behaviour and its epistemological implications on the creation, transfer, and growth of IS knowledge.
A review of eminence of scientometric indicators in scientific research productivity
The evaluation and assessment of scientific research output is essential to determine its success, eminence, growth and development of an individual or an institution. A reasonable and unbiased
The Power of Scientometrics and the Development of Economics
Abstract: Citation metrics and its related indices and rankings have become increasingly important in the evaluation of research. Such indices are part of a more general tendency aiming for the
Informetrics of Scientometrics abstracts: a rhetorical move analysis of the research abstracts published in Scientometrics journal
It can be concluded that there are some reasons such as situational options, community of practice, and the extent of the explicitness of the information which have effects on the information provided by the research abstracts.
Scientometric analysis of scientific publications in CSCW
This paper provides a quantitative assessment of the scientific literature for mapping the intellectual structure of CSCW research and its scientific development over a 15-year period (2001–2015).
Development of Public Administration Research with a Bibliometric Analysis
Recently, several studies adopted bibliometric methodology to estimate the development of the field of public administration (PA). However, only a small scope of journals was covered in their
The Effect of Scientific Collaboration on CSCW Research: A Scientometric Study
This work measures the correlation between a set of features related to the influence of collaboration types on the number of citations as well as the geographical distribution of the accumulated contribution to the CSCW literature to represent a starting point to demonstrate how the study of scientific collaboration can partly explain the variations in the numbers of citations, frequency of papers, and topics addressed.


The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible
This study attempts to clarify some of the topics mentioned against the application of the SSCI for evaluation purposes, like the existing publication and citation culture within the social sciences, the effect of variable citation windows, and the (geographical) origin of citation flows.
Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century - A review
The drivers of citations in management science journals
Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review
This paper addresses research performance monitoring of the social sciences and the humanities using citation analysis using a broader range of both publications and citation indicators and three options for bibliometric monitoring are discussed.
Evaluating research: from informed peer review to bibliometrics
Empirical evidence shows that for the natural and formal sciences, the bibliometric methodology is by far preferable to peer-review for national research assessment exercises.
Trends in the Usage of ISI Bibliometric Data: Uses, Abuses, and Implications
The history of the development of impact factors is highlighted, the limitations in their use are described, and a critique of the usage ofimpact factors in academic settings is provided.
Measurement of Science. Study of the Development of Science as an Information Process
The informational crisis and slowing down in the development of science are discussed, and new organizational forms, invisible collectives, are described, and it is shown how it is possible to use the language of bibliographical references for establishing internal connections in publications.
Peer review for the evaluation of academic research: lessons from the Italian experience
The aim of the paper is to control the reliability of peer review when evaluating academic research in the Three-Year Research Assessment Exercise developed in Italy. Our analysis covers four
The development of frames of references
Journal-journal citations are discussed as a potential candidate for a domain beyond the control of policy-makers and authors or research groups and therefore may function as a relatively stable and easily accessible baseline for the ‘calibration’ of outputs and outcomes of science policy.
Counting the citations: a comparison of Web of Science and Google Scholar in the field of business and management
The conclusion is that Web of Science should not be used for measuring research impact in management and that Google Scholar, whilst somewhat unreliable, has a much better coverage.