A rejoinder to Henschen: the issue of VAR and DSGE models

  title={A rejoinder to Henschen: the issue of VAR and DSGE models},
  author={Mariusz Maziarz and Robert Mr{\'o}z},
  journal={Journal of Economic Methodology},
  pages={266 - 268}



Response to Henschen: causal pluralism in macroeconomics

ABSTRACT In his recent paper in the Journal of Economic Methodology, Tobias Henschen puts forth a manipulationist definition of macroeconomic causality that strives for adequacy. As the notion of

Mechanistic explanation without the ontic conception

The ontic conception of scientific explanation has been constructed and motivated on the basis of a putative lexical ambiguity in the term explanation. I raise a puzzle for this ambiguity claim, and

The in-principle inconclusiveness of causal evidence in macroeconomics

The paper analyzes the methods that macroeconomists can use to provide evidence in support of causal hypotheses: the instrumental variable (IV) method and econometric causality tests. It argues that

What is macroeconomic causality?

The paper aims to develop an adequate account of macroeconomic causality. It discusses the definition that is central to Woodward’s interventionist account and the definitions that can be extracted

Causation, Evidence, and Inference

1. Causation in a Complex World Part I: Evidence 2. What's Wrong with Our Theories of Evidence? 3. Evidence in Context Part II: Singular Causation 4. Counterfactuals, Thought Experiments and Singular

Strategies for Discovering Mechanisms: Schema Instantiation, Modular Subassembly, Forward/Backward Chaining

Discovery proceeds in stages of construction, evaluation, and revision. Each of these stages is constrained by what is known or conjectured about what is being discovered. A new characterization of


Existing strategies for econometric analysis related to macroeconomics are subject to a number of serious objections, some recently formulated, some old. These objections are summarized in this

The New Mechanical Philosophy

Natural and social scientists often characterize their work as a search for the mechanisms responsible for the phenomena they study. While this way of thinking about the nature of science has its