A reasonable thing that just might work

@article{Rohrlich2015ART,
  title={A reasonable thing that just might work},
  author={Daniel Rohrlich},
  journal={arXiv: Quantum Physics},
  year={2015}
}
  • D. Rohrlich
  • Published 6 July 2015
  • Physics
  • arXiv: Quantum Physics
In 1964, John Bell proved that quantum mechanics is \unreasonable" (to use Einstein’s term): there are nonlocal bipartite quantum correlations. But they are not the most nonlocal bipartite correlations consistent with relativistic causality (\no superluminal signalling"): also maximally nonlocal \superquantum" (or \PR-box") correlations are consistent with relativistic causality. I show that|unlike quantum correlations|these correlations do not have a classical limit consistent with… 
1 Citations

Figures from this paper

Violation of Bell Inequalities: Mapping the Conceptual Implications
This short article concentrates on the conceptual aspects of the violation of Bell inequalities, and acts as a map to the 265 cited references. The article outlines (a) relevant characteristics of

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 46 REFERENCES
PR-Box Correlations Have No Classical Limit
One of Yakir Aharonov’s endlessly captivating physics ideas is the conjecture that two axioms, namely relativistic causality (“no superluminal signalling”) and nonlocality, so nearly contradict each
Bell’s theorem and the causal arrow of time
Einstein held that the formalism of quantum mechanics involves “spooky actions at a distance.” In the 1960s, Bell amplified this by showing that the predictions of quantum mechanics disagree with the
Information causality as a physical principle
TLDR
It is suggested that information causality—a generalization of the no-signalling condition—might be one of the foundational properties of nature and help to distinguish physical theories from non-physical ones.
ON THE EINSTEIN PODOLSKY ROSEN PARADOX*
THE paradox of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen [1] was advanced as an argument that quantum mechanics could not be a complete theory but should be supplemented by additional variables. These additional
New Slant on the EPR-Bell Experiment
The best case for thinking that quantum mechanics is nonlocal rests on Bell's Theorem, and later results of the same kind. However, the correlations characteristic of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen
Dispelling the Quantum Spooks: A Clue That Einstein Missed?
It is well-known that Bell’s Theorem and other No Hidden Variable theorems have a “retrocausal loophole”, because they assume that the values of pre-existing hidden variables are independent of
Going Beyond Bell’s Theorem
Bell’s Theorem proved that one cannot in general reproduce the results of quantum theory with a classical, deterministic local model. However, Einstein originally considered the case where one could
All reversible dynamics in maximally nonlocal theories are trivial.
TLDR
It is shown that reversible transformations in post-quantum theories in which maximally nonlocal states (nonlocal boxes) occur are trivial: they consist solely of local operations and permutations of systems.
A glance beyond the quantum model
One of the most important problems in physics is to reconcile quantum mechanics with general relativity, and some authors have suggested that this may be realized at the expense of having to drop the
Limit on nonlocality in any world in which communication complexity is not trivial.
TLDR
A partial answer to the question why are the correlations achievable by quantum mechanics not maximal among those that preserve causality is given by showing that slightly stronger correlations would result in a world in which communication complexity becomes trivial.
...
...