A randomized trial of the sleeved cytobrush and the endocervical curette.

@article{Boardman2003ART,
  title={A randomized trial of the sleeved cytobrush and the endocervical curette.},
  author={Lori A. Boardman and Heidi Meinz and Margaret M. Steinhoff and Walter W Heber and Jeffrey Blume},
  journal={Obstetrics and gynecology},
  year={2003},
  volume={101 3},
  pages={
          426-30
        }
}
OBJECTIVE To compare endocervical specimens obtained with the endocervical curette to those obtained with the sleeved cytobrush. METHODS All nonpregnant women undergoing either cervical conization or hysterectomy were eligible for this randomized, split-sample trial. Both endocervical curette and cytobrush sampling were performed on all 62 participants before surgery, with randomization designating the order of the sampling procedures. A pathologist blinded to sampling order reviewed study… CONTINUE READING

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-9 OF 9 CITATIONS

Comparison of Tissue Yield Using Frictional Fabric Brush Versus Sharp Curettage For Endocervical Curettage.

  • Journal of lower genital tract disease
  • 2017
VIEW 8 EXCERPTS
CITES METHODS & BACKGROUND
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

Colposcopy: an evidence-based update.

  • The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice
  • 2005
VIEW 2 EXCERPTS
CITES BACKGROUND